HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...
HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...
HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in light <strong>of</strong> the mountain <strong>of</strong> other testimony detailing the violent practices <strong>of</strong> the gang. Had<br />
this been the only comment regarding violence, it could not so easily “blend in,” and we<br />
might reach a different result. As it stands in this case, however, the statement constituted<br />
harmless error.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
In sum, the Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in permitting <strong>No</strong>rris to testify<br />
because ample fact evidence established a connection between Quintanilla’s shooting death<br />
and the gang MS-13. Although the unfair prejudice <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>No</strong>rris’s statements outweighed<br />
its probative value, the error was harmless. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment <strong>of</strong> the trial<br />
court.<br />
JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR<br />
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY AFFIRMED.<br />
COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANT.<br />
23