21.06.2013 Views

HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...

HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...

HEADNOTE: Mario Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State of Maryland, No. 98 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I agree with the majority that most <strong>of</strong> the expert witness’s gang-related testimony<br />

is relevant to the issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gutierrez</strong>’s motive to commit murder. I also agree with the<br />

majority’s conclusion that “the trial court erred in allowing [the expert witness] to<br />

comment that MS-13 is the gang that law enforcement ‘had seen the most violence with<br />

recenly for the past four, four and a half years in this region.’” <strong>Gutierrez</strong>, slip op. at 22.<br />

I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the trial judge’s error was<br />

harmless. Accordingly, I join in and adopt the reasoning articulated in Chief Judge<br />

Bell’s dissenting opinion, to the extent that the majority failed to apply the harmless<br />

error test as explained by this Court in Dorsey v. <strong>State</strong>, 276 Md. 638, 350 A.2d 665<br />

(1976) and recently reaffirmed by this Court in Perez v. <strong>State</strong>, 420 Md. 57, 21 A.3d<br />

1048 (2011); Dove v. <strong>State</strong>, 415 Md. 727, 4 A.3d 976 (2010); Donaldson v. <strong>State</strong>, 416<br />

Md. 467, 7 A.3d 84 (2010), and Parker v. <strong>State</strong>, 408 Md. 428, 970 A.2d 320 (2009).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!