Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of
Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of
Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER.24<br />
THE NUREMBERG 'TRIALS'<br />
".. a libel on the military pr<strong>of</strong>ession."<br />
Vice Admiral Hewlett <strong>The</strong>baud, USN<br />
"... a fantastic desecration <strong>of</strong> the ideals <strong>of</strong> Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage <strong>of</strong><br />
justice... a misuse <strong>of</strong> evidence for vicious ends, all <strong>of</strong> which will someday be exposed as a<br />
shocking travesty <strong>of</strong> high legal and moral principles."<br />
Henry M. Adams, Ph.D. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, University <strong>of</strong> California<br />
JUSTICE ON TRIAL<br />
<strong>The</strong> International Tribunal at Nuremberg, set up to pass judgement on the vanquished nations, was<br />
neither international nor legal in any accepted sense <strong>of</strong> these terms. <strong>Most</strong> <strong>of</strong> these 'trials' were<br />
arranged independently <strong>of</strong> other victor nations; Great Britain, France, the United States and the Soviet<br />
Union along with dictatorships created by the allies, Participation by neutral states or observers was<br />
neither invited nor welcomed. <strong>Most</strong>ly, they were 'military tribunals' such as the American Military<br />
Tribunal' which ran 'trials' at Dachau.<br />
<strong>The</strong> British government set up its own trials, independently <strong>of</strong> other victor nations so it is difficult to<br />
imagine why or how such charades could ever be described as being international in nature. <strong>The</strong> U.S<br />
Supreme Court on December, 20th, 1948, washed its hands <strong>of</strong> U.S Government responsibility when it<br />
stated: "We are satisfied that the Tribunal sentencing these prisoners is not a tribunal <strong>of</strong> the United<br />
States."<br />
"<strong>The</strong>n why, one might ask, were U.S. citizens and government <strong>of</strong>ficials serving as prosecutors and<br />
judges, and why has the U.S. Government participated in and endorsed an alien tribunal which does<br />
not accord to defendants the same rights which American defendants would receive before U.S. courts<br />
at home?"<br />
- H.K Thompson and Henry Strutz,M.A. Doenitz at Nuremberg: A re-Appraisal. N.Y., 1976<br />
"<strong>The</strong> Nuremberg process in itself was not a judicial process, but an act <strong>of</strong> vengeance against the<br />
defeated. Nuremberg was particularly pr<strong>of</strong>aned by the fact that the Russians were among the judges<br />
and themselves guilty <strong>of</strong> many crimes and atrocities..... Being a jurist myself, and a Christian, I abhor<br />
the justice <strong>of</strong> Nuremberg." - <strong>Most</strong> Reverend. Bishop Vincentas Brizgys, Bishop <strong>of</strong> Lithuania<br />
"I think the world expected us to give pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> American legal principles and judicial practice by<br />
using them when dealing with our defeated enemies. Instead <strong>of</strong> this, Gestapo and MVD methods<br />
180