27.06.2013 Views

Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of

Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of

Stands Among The World's Most Stands Among The ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER.24<br />

THE NUREMBERG 'TRIALS'<br />

".. a libel on the military pr<strong>of</strong>ession."<br />

Vice Admiral Hewlett <strong>The</strong>baud, USN<br />

"... a fantastic desecration <strong>of</strong> the ideals <strong>of</strong> Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage <strong>of</strong><br />

justice... a misuse <strong>of</strong> evidence for vicious ends, all <strong>of</strong> which will someday be exposed as a<br />

shocking travesty <strong>of</strong> high legal and moral principles."<br />

Henry M. Adams, Ph.D. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, University <strong>of</strong> California<br />

JUSTICE ON TRIAL<br />

<strong>The</strong> International Tribunal at Nuremberg, set up to pass judgement on the vanquished nations, was<br />

neither international nor legal in any accepted sense <strong>of</strong> these terms. <strong>Most</strong> <strong>of</strong> these 'trials' were<br />

arranged independently <strong>of</strong> other victor nations; Great Britain, France, the United States and the Soviet<br />

Union along with dictatorships created by the allies, Participation by neutral states or observers was<br />

neither invited nor welcomed. <strong>Most</strong>ly, they were 'military tribunals' such as the American Military<br />

Tribunal' which ran 'trials' at Dachau.<br />

<strong>The</strong> British government set up its own trials, independently <strong>of</strong> other victor nations so it is difficult to<br />

imagine why or how such charades could ever be described as being international in nature. <strong>The</strong> U.S<br />

Supreme Court on December, 20th, 1948, washed its hands <strong>of</strong> U.S Government responsibility when it<br />

stated: "We are satisfied that the Tribunal sentencing these prisoners is not a tribunal <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

States."<br />

"<strong>The</strong>n why, one might ask, were U.S. citizens and government <strong>of</strong>ficials serving as prosecutors and<br />

judges, and why has the U.S. Government participated in and endorsed an alien tribunal which does<br />

not accord to defendants the same rights which American defendants would receive before U.S. courts<br />

at home?"<br />

- H.K Thompson and Henry Strutz,M.A. Doenitz at Nuremberg: A re-Appraisal. N.Y., 1976<br />

"<strong>The</strong> Nuremberg process in itself was not a judicial process, but an act <strong>of</strong> vengeance against the<br />

defeated. Nuremberg was particularly pr<strong>of</strong>aned by the fact that the Russians were among the judges<br />

and themselves guilty <strong>of</strong> many crimes and atrocities..... Being a jurist myself, and a Christian, I abhor<br />

the justice <strong>of</strong> Nuremberg." - <strong>Most</strong> Reverend. Bishop Vincentas Brizgys, Bishop <strong>of</strong> Lithuania<br />

"I think the world expected us to give pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> American legal principles and judicial practice by<br />

using them when dealing with our defeated enemies. Instead <strong>of</strong> this, Gestapo and MVD methods<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!