27.06.2013 Views

The Discontinuous Conduction Mode Sepic and ´ Cuk Power

The Discontinuous Conduction Mode Sepic and ´ Cuk Power

The Discontinuous Conduction Mode Sepic and ´ Cuk Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

636 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 44, NO. 5, OCTOBER 1997<br />

(a) (b)<br />

(c) (d)<br />

Fig. 10. Experimental results. (a) Input voltage <strong>and</strong> current (filtered). (b) Inductor currents. (c) Output voltage. (d) Dynamic response for a load change.<br />

<strong>The</strong> control-to-output transfer function ( F) is<br />

(47)<br />

<strong>The</strong> feedback loop of a PFP must be slow (crossover<br />

frequency below one-third of the line frequency) to avoid excessive<br />

second-harmonic injection from the output voltage into<br />

the input current (resulting in third-order harmonic current) [1].<br />

<strong>The</strong> system is stable if the open-loop transfer function crosses<br />

0 dB with 20 dB slope. Taking these points into account, an<br />

output voltage feedback loop was implemented, yielding the<br />

following open-loop transfer function:<br />

(48)<br />

<strong>The</strong> zero crossover frequency is about 5 Hz with 20 dB<br />

slope, <strong>and</strong> the gain at 100 Hz is close to 0.01.<br />

Fig. 10(a) shows the converter input voltage <strong>and</strong> current.<br />

It can be observed that the current actually follows the input<br />

voltage. Fig. 10(b) shows <strong>and</strong> inductor currents for a<br />

few switching periods, whereas Fig. 10(c) shows the output<br />

voltage. <strong>The</strong> dynamic response of the PFP for a 100–50 W load<br />

change <strong>and</strong> vice versa can be seen in Fig. 10(d). Experimental<br />

results confirm the analysis carried out in this paper.<br />

V. CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>Sepic</strong> <strong>and</strong> Ćuk converters working as PFP in DCM are<br />

perfect preregulators. <strong>The</strong> input current naturally follows the<br />

input voltage, <strong>and</strong> theoretical power factor is one. <strong>The</strong> operation<br />

analysis for each stage leads to the equations for<br />

correctly designing the converter. <strong>The</strong> ripple present in the<br />

input current is limited by design, choosing an adequate<br />

value for the input inductor ( ). A correct choice of the<br />

intermediate capacitor is fundamental in obtaining a highquality<br />

input current.<br />

<strong>The</strong> static <strong>and</strong> dynamic simulation results, as well as the experimental<br />

results, have confirmed the validity of the analysis<br />

<strong>and</strong> design approaches presented here.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] L. H. Dixon, “High power factor preregulators for off-line power<br />

supplies,” in Unitrode <strong>Power</strong> Supply Design Seminar Manual SEM600,<br />

Unitrode Corp., Waltham, MA, pp. 6.1–6.16, 1988.<br />

[2] I. Barbi <strong>and</strong> S. A. O. Silva, “Sinusoidal line current rectification at<br />

unity power factor with boost quasiresonant converters,” in Proc. IEEE<br />

APEC, 1990, pp. 553–562.<br />

[3] C. Zhov, R. B. Ridley, <strong>and</strong> F. C. Lee, “Design <strong>and</strong> analysis of a<br />

hysteretic boost power factor correction circuit,” in Proc. IEEE PESC,<br />

1990, pp. 800–807.<br />

[4] J. Sebastián, J. Uceda, J. A. Cobos, J. Arau, <strong>and</strong> F. Aldana, “Improving<br />

power factor correction in distributed power supply systems using<br />

PWM <strong>and</strong> ZCS-QR <strong>Sepic</strong> topologies,” in Proc. IEEE PESC, 1991, pp.<br />

780–791.<br />

Authorized licensed use limited to: ELETTRONICA E INFORMATICA PADOVA. Downloaded on April 12, 2009 at 16:08 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!