functionalized surfaces on porous silica by atomic layer ... - Aaltodoc
functionalized surfaces on porous silica by atomic layer ... - Aaltodoc
functionalized surfaces on porous silica by atomic layer ... - Aaltodoc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Weight remaining/%<br />
100<br />
99<br />
98<br />
97<br />
96<br />
95<br />
94<br />
EP 10<br />
93<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />
T/°C<br />
Figure 9. Thermogram of EP 10 <strong>silica</strong> (20 mg) heated at a rate of 5 °C min -1 under arg<strong>on</strong><br />
flow. I<br />
In this work, the OH group c<strong>on</strong>tents determined <strong>by</strong> dynamic TG measurements from several<br />
<strong>silica</strong> samples I were in good agreement with the results obtained <strong>by</strong> a reference method, 1 H<br />
MAS NMR 38 (magic angle spinning NMR). The samples for NMR analysis were heat-treated<br />
under a static air atmosphere in a muffle furnace. Not <strong>on</strong>ly the total hydroxyl group c<strong>on</strong>tents<br />
(determined <strong>by</strong> TG at 100-130 °C) but also the hydroxyl group c<strong>on</strong>tents determined <strong>by</strong> TG at<br />
550 (Figure 10) and 1000 °C were very close to the 1 H MAS NMR results. I There was a<br />
larger difference between the methods, however, in regard to the number of OH groups in<br />
<strong>silica</strong> samples determined at 1000 °C. The results for EP 10 <strong>silica</strong> are shown in Table 3.<br />
The TG method described above can easily be applied, especially for the determinati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />
total OH group c<strong>on</strong>tent and the silanol number, but unfortunately not so reliably for the<br />
determinati<strong>on</strong> of OH groups at temperatures higher than 550 °C. The greatest differences<br />
between the results of the two methods were observed with the powder-like <strong>silica</strong>s MCM-41<br />
and Aerosil pressed into briquettes before the TG measurements (Figure 10). In earlier<br />
studies, the OH group c<strong>on</strong>tents calculated from the TG results were not compared with the<br />
results from a reference method. 1,105,109-113<br />
31<br />
10<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
1st derivative<br />
/0.01*%/min