Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Online - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Even with firm principles, journalists and organizations will always face difficult decisions. But the principles can lead to some guidelines -- not rules -- that can serve the decision-making. Open-ended questions produce informed discussion and good decisions. Here are some questions that can help with the decision-making on commentary, reporting, voice and tone. What is this journalist's primary role? What is this journalist's role in the context of the moment? Is innovation in tone and voice appropriate for this content? Is the content straight news reporting, informed analysis or opinion? Does this content blur or blend the roles of reporter and commentator? If so, how should this content be labeled? Does the tone of this content diverge from that of the parent site? Does this content need be put through the same editing process as similar content on the parent site? Why? Why not? Is there anything in this role that could create the appearance of a conflict of interest, or that could imperil the journalist's ability to report the story objectively in the future? Is there anything in this role that would cause the principles in the coverage to doubt the accuracy or independence of the reporter's future work on this topic? Have all the proper stakeholders been involved in this decision? Frequently Asked Questions What do you mean by saying that principles should apply across platforms? We believe these ethical principles apply to any news operation that aspires to practice journalism: an international cable news network, a local newspaper's Web site, independent bloggers, etc. The key is to be clear on what you stand for -- and what you are doing. What do you mean by saying that principles should apply across all content? We believe these ethical principles apply to all content, regardless of whether it's text, photos, audio, video, etc., and whether it's on the web, on a blog, in print, on broadcast, or delivered via email, podcasts or beyond. Is the opinion of the "objective" reporter ever of value? Absolutely. But whether that opinion should be expressed, and how it should be expressed, is a matter to be reviewed with your editor. In cases where "objective" reporters believe expressing an opinion in any forum is necessary, they should discuss the matter with their editors. Be cautious, and be transparent. What are the risks when a reporter expresses an opinion?
For starters, it could imperil your ability to continue to report the story accurately and fairly. If you express a bias on a topic, your sources of information may change the way they respond to your inquiries, and your readers may doubt the accuracy of future stories. Your expressions of bias will not be forgotten quickly. What are the risks of "unedited journalism" -- live Web discussions, TV appearances, radio hits, etc.? Just the nature of these other forums makes it a slippery slope for "objective" journalists. You will likely be pressed by an interviewer, a reader, etc., because they want to know your opinion. Beware: Expressing an opinion on a topic you're covering -- otherwise objectively -- runs the risk of compromising your reporting and/or relationship with your sources. Yes, journalists have opinions on the stories they cover, but good journalists are defined by their ability to not let their opinions interfere with their coverage of the story. They are guided by the principle of independence. Should journalists be allowed to keep personal blogs? Yes, but journalists who work for journalistic organizations should acknowledge that role. They should also recognize their responsibility to the organization, and review the plans for the blog with an editor, so that any potential conflicts can be discussed. It's always best to operate on the premise of "no surprises" for your editor or your organization -- or your readers. Is it ever appropriate for a reporter to write anonymously on someone else's blog or site? Is it appropriate for a reporter operate a blog under an alias? No. Professional journalists should not write or comment on other blogs anonymously or run an anonymous blog. Reporters are expected to own responsibility for their work, and commenting or blogging anonymously compromises that core principle. If a reporter believes that some anonymity of similar tactic is required -- possibly as part of a reporting assignment or a restaurant review -- the strategy should be used carefully and in consultation with an editor. And if you decide it is appropriate, consider the plan for eventual disclosure and transparency. This same rule applies to any "journalist": bloggers, editors, photographers, etc. Do we need to differentiate between opinion blogs and news blogs? Remember that a "blog" is only a medium. It's what you do with it that matters. News organizations should differentiate clearly between opinion blogs and news blogs. Though they may share a format, the driving force behind clear labeling is the content of the journalism, not the format. News organizations should articulate clear standards and labeling for all of their news and opinion, whether it's on a printed page or in a blog. Can opinion journalists/bloggers do straight news reporting? It may, at times, be impossible to avoid having commentators do straight reporting; consider the columnist or editorial writer who happens upon the scene of a breaking news story. But beware of situations where the coverage involves a topic on which the commentator has already opined. The opinions could compromise -- in fact or in perception -- the reporter's independence. Again, transparency and disclosure can be effective strategies in a crucial moment.
Page 1 and 2:
Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Onlin
Page 3 and 4:
Dengan menggunakan satu web browser
Page 5 and 6:
yang senang melakukan hal-hal tekni
Page 7 and 8:
dengannya atau memang sengaja dipro
Page 9 and 10: Mampu menyajikan berita dan informa
Page 11 and 12: Tantangan Jurnalis di Era Cyber htt
Page 13 and 14: Perkembangan jurnalisme online menu
Page 15 and 16: Untuk menjelaskan fenomena adanya k
Page 17 and 18: Jurnalisme Online Lily Yulianti Kar
Page 19 and 20: 1. Jurnalisme online merupakan “m
Page 21 and 22: Oleh karena itu seorang reporter me
Page 23 and 24: Namun jika menilik Pasal 1 ayat (1)
Page 25 and 26: • Dikelola menggunakan desain int
Page 27 and 28: Blog: Technorati.com, Pubsub.com Tr
Page 29 and 30: “Open-Source” News: WikiNews, U
Page 31 and 32: Long stories on the web are hard to
Page 33 and 34: Quiz Interactive Game Interactive F
Page 35 and 36: Twitter (Microblogging) 140 = “
Page 37 and 38: Sentence Length Long sentences brea
Page 39 and 40: 7. Start a blog, now: With blogging
Page 41 and 42: However, an increase in competition
Page 43 and 44: That's not to say that journalism o
Page 45 and 46: • The Dallas Morning News' Web si
Page 47 and 48: None of this would have been possib
Page 49 and 50: publisher. Each chapter includes a
Page 51 and 52: Friend and Singer provide a useful
Page 53 and 54: Find facts, not just others' opinio
Page 55 and 56: 3. Blogging doesn't magically make
Page 57 and 58: In an avalanche of information, gli
Page 59: In August 2006, Poynter gathered a
Page 63 and 64: hold powerful interests accountable
Page 65 and 66: Explain our decision making in term
Page 67 and 68: of civil discourse and debate. News
Page 69 and 70: User-Generated Content User-generat
Page 71 and 72: 5.) Moderating is an essential elem
Page 73 and 74: Linking is at the core of the Web e
Page 75 and 76: Do Web sites have it too easy becau
Page 77 and 78: form (an actual quote or a similar
Page 79 and 80: online civility brought about by th
Page 81 and 82: For more on Keen and his book, see
Page 83 and 84: Oreskes believes you can “set asi
Page 85 and 86: Andrew Keen has written a book that
Page 87 and 88: necessity of listening to the amate
Page 89 and 90: Its proponents situate CJ as a Cate
Page 91 and 92: 5. Parallels: Event-driven & Civic
Page 93 and 94: Many CJ and Web 2.0 projects fall i
Page 95 and 96: Mintzberg, Henry. Managers Not MBAs
Page 97 and 98: journalism if it is to be a threat
Page 99 and 100: umour and assumption; a free-for-al
Page 101 and 102: You, and Ed Wasserman, are probably
Page 103 and 104: He writes in his book that he drank
Page 105 and 106: We listen, take notes, check if the
Page 107 and 108: Citizen journalism, she continues,
Page 109 and 110: humans could have produced. Similar
Page 111 and 112:
But some people don't have access a
Page 113 and 114:
perpetual evolution of technology,
Page 115 and 116:
your reporting and/or relationship
Page 117 and 118:
Know your subject Reporters should
Page 119 and 120:
Resist the temptation to respond in
Page 121 and 122:
3. The Trust Principles apply to Tw
Page 123:
This page was last modified 11:24,
show all

Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Online - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?