Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Online - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Frequently Asked Questions: How do you decide what to link to in the work you publish online? We start by asking the questions listed in the publishing protocol above. The linking decision requires more specific considerations, including the relevance and reliability of the material that might be linked. The decision to link or not -- especially to controversial content that the audience could find on its own - - creates an opportunity for explanation and discussion. Linking decisions should be based on serving the audience with as accurate and as complete a picture of the world as possible. Such decisions should not be limited by commercial concerns about sending customers to others' sites. When is it appropriate to publish material that has not been reviewed or edited? Decisions about when to edit -- and how much -- are best made along a risk/benefit scale that includes such considerations as the nature of the information, the relative importance of speed versus accuracy, the relative importance of quantity vs. quality of the material to be published, the availability of resources, and the skill, experience and track record of the person producing the content. Just as live shots increased the likelihood of unedited content appearing on television news broadcasts, various digital formats now emerging will create platforms for content subjected to a range of editing - from none to rigorous. Whatever level of editing is applied, the variety of new platforms underscores how important it is for publishers to communicate clearly just what level of editing has been applied. Why would you ever allow people to publish something without their real identity attached to what they say? There are times when withholding the full name of an author could serve a useful purpose. A news organization might publish unsigned editorials in an effort to express a view meant to represent that of an entire editorial board. A civil servant adding a comment to a blog might sign only as Ticked Off in Tallahassee in order to add useful information to a political debate without jeopardizing his or her job. Even more significant is the need to provide protected anonymity to whistle blowers whose information can be independently verified. For the most part, though, it's difficult to make the case that the credibility of anonymous content can ever match that of material whose author is known. As journalists, our default position is to publish material only with full names attached. We make exceptions only in rare cases, only for compelling reasons, and only with explanations attached explaining the reason for the anonymity. (2/5/07 update: There is significant disagreement among participants about the topic of anonymity, including sharp disagreement with the paragraph above. See, in particular, Steve Yelvington's thoughtful essay on anonymity in a recent issue of Nieman Reports. We hope revisions to the accompanying Wiki will reflect additional perspectives on the issue.) How do you decide when a user should be banned from publishing on your site? This question raises a fundamental tension for journalists working in digital media: the need for a news organization to accommodate conflicting views at the same time it creates and maintains a community
of civil discourse and debate. News organizations should create terms of service for users contributing content to the news organization's digital editions. Such terms cover such issues as the use of obscenity, personal attacks, etc. in material published by non-staffers. Publishers should also be clear about the consequences for violating terms of service, e.g. immediate banning from further posting, suspension, etc. How do you decide when the editorial significance of an event overrides the limited quality of the video or audio? Journalists should be guided by three main principles: telling the story as fully and truthfully as possible, acting as independently as possible, and causing as little harm as possible. Low production quality -whether video or audio or something else -- diminishes the credibility of the material presented. Journalists need to weigh that consideration against the importance and interest level of the event that's being reported. The greater the importance and interest level, the greater allowance for limited quality production values. (This section composed by: Sharon Rosenhause, Rich Murphy, Neil Budde, Steve Yelvington, Vanessa Goodrum and Bill Mitchell.) Workplace Issues: Speed, Thoroughness & Capacity There is an inherent tension between the value of speed in the online world and journalism's obligation for thorough, accurate, ethical work. A set of standards that creates a conscious, deliberate process helps balance these sometimes conflicting values. In addition, leadership needs to be committed to applying tools, time and training to meet these standards. This is especially important in a new medium. We know that the online universe offers endless opportunities for innovation, timeliness and freedom. These standards are intended to improve the work of journalists as they explore the medium's potential. Issues We're in an environment with exponentially expanding material (including user-generated content) and limited resources; can we vet everything that appears online? Job functions are changing, requiring different skill sets and attitudes. The online environment requires news be produced quickly as possible. Institutions may not value online platforms as much as they should. Notifying users of changes and corrections is difficult. Editors and staffers no longer have total control of the online product, by design. The process for publishing material online is often ad hoc, without deliberation. <strong>Online</strong> platforms are often detached from the legacy products which give them their imprimatur. Linking to outside material is a strength of the Web, but also raises a host of ethical issues. Principles & Values
Page 1 and 2:
Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Onlin
Page 3 and 4:
Dengan menggunakan satu web browser
Page 5 and 6:
yang senang melakukan hal-hal tekni
Page 7 and 8:
dengannya atau memang sengaja dipro
Page 9 and 10:
Mampu menyajikan berita dan informa
Page 11 and 12:
Tantangan Jurnalis di Era Cyber htt
Page 13 and 14:
Perkembangan jurnalisme online menu
Page 15 and 16: Untuk menjelaskan fenomena adanya k
Page 17 and 18: Jurnalisme Online Lily Yulianti Kar
Page 19 and 20: 1. Jurnalisme online merupakan “m
Page 21 and 22: Oleh karena itu seorang reporter me
Page 23 and 24: Namun jika menilik Pasal 1 ayat (1)
Page 25 and 26: • Dikelola menggunakan desain int
Page 27 and 28: Blog: Technorati.com, Pubsub.com Tr
Page 29 and 30: “Open-Source” News: WikiNews, U
Page 31 and 32: Long stories on the web are hard to
Page 33 and 34: Quiz Interactive Game Interactive F
Page 35 and 36: Twitter (Microblogging) 140 = “
Page 37 and 38: Sentence Length Long sentences brea
Page 39 and 40: 7. Start a blog, now: With blogging
Page 41 and 42: However, an increase in competition
Page 43 and 44: That's not to say that journalism o
Page 45 and 46: • The Dallas Morning News' Web si
Page 47 and 48: None of this would have been possib
Page 49 and 50: publisher. Each chapter includes a
Page 51 and 52: Friend and Singer provide a useful
Page 53 and 54: Find facts, not just others' opinio
Page 55 and 56: 3. Blogging doesn't magically make
Page 57 and 58: In an avalanche of information, gli
Page 59 and 60: In August 2006, Poynter gathered a
Page 61 and 62: For starters, it could imperil your
Page 63 and 64: hold powerful interests accountable
Page 65: Explain our decision making in term
Page 69 and 70: User-Generated Content User-generat
Page 71 and 72: 5.) Moderating is an essential elem
Page 73 and 74: Linking is at the core of the Web e
Page 75 and 76: Do Web sites have it too easy becau
Page 77 and 78: form (an actual quote or a similar
Page 79 and 80: online civility brought about by th
Page 81 and 82: For more on Keen and his book, see
Page 83 and 84: Oreskes believes you can “set asi
Page 85 and 86: Andrew Keen has written a book that
Page 87 and 88: necessity of listening to the amate
Page 89 and 90: Its proponents situate CJ as a Cate
Page 91 and 92: 5. Parallels: Event-driven & Civic
Page 93 and 94: Many CJ and Web 2.0 projects fall i
Page 95 and 96: Mintzberg, Henry. Managers Not MBAs
Page 97 and 98: journalism if it is to be a threat
Page 99 and 100: umour and assumption; a free-for-al
Page 101 and 102: You, and Ed Wasserman, are probably
Page 103 and 104: He writes in his book that he drank
Page 105 and 106: We listen, take notes, check if the
Page 107 and 108: Citizen journalism, she continues,
Page 109 and 110: humans could have produced. Similar
Page 111 and 112: But some people don't have access a
Page 113 and 114: perpetual evolution of technology,
Page 115 and 116: your reporting and/or relationship
Page 117 and 118:
Know your subject Reporters should
Page 119 and 120:
Resist the temptation to respond in
Page 121 and 122:
3. The Trust Principles apply to Tw
Page 123:
This page was last modified 11:24,
show all

Modul Mata Kuliah Journalisme Online - Ayo Menulis FISIP UAJY

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?