07.07.2013 Views

Rehabilitation and Restoration Of Degraded Forests (PDF) - IUCN

Rehabilitation and Restoration Of Degraded Forests (PDF) - IUCN

Rehabilitation and Restoration Of Degraded Forests (PDF) - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION OF DEGRADED FORESTS<br />

6.4. Interventions providing biodiversity as well as productivity benefits<br />

The primary benefit of the approaches above is the restoration of some<br />

or most of the biodiversity. Immediate or direct improvements in<br />

human well-being are often limited, although considerable indirect<br />

economic <strong>and</strong> social benefits may develop over time because of the<br />

ecological services provided (e.g. watershed protection). The absence of<br />

an early direct benefit necessarily limits the number of situations in<br />

which ecological restoration might be attempted. It also means that<br />

restoration is usually attempted only in relatively small areas.<br />

The most common alternative method of overcoming degradation is<br />

some form of reclamation using monoculture plantings of a single<br />

species. These species are usually exotic trees that provide a commercial<br />

benefit but do nothing to reverse the ongoing trend towards l<strong>and</strong>scape<br />

simplification. Some of the advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages are shown in<br />

Table 2. A third alternative is the approach referred to earlier as<br />

rehabilitation, in which are several other ways to overcome degradation<br />

that provide a commercial or socially useful product <strong>and</strong> also increase<br />

biodiversity across the l<strong>and</strong>scape. As well as improving biodiversity,<br />

some of these approaches may even offer better production or additional<br />

benefits than those provided by reclamation.<br />

6.4.1 Managing secondary forests<br />

Secondary or regrowth forests are often viewed as having little biodiversity<br />

value or potential for contributing to rural livelihoods. For<br />

example, they are often thought to be exclusively occupied by trees<br />

with low timber densities that have little economic value. These<br />

assumptions may be wrong. Depending on their origins, they may be<br />

able to make a substantial contribution to biodiversity protection <strong>and</strong><br />

also help provide a variety of goods <strong>and</strong> services. In addition, the sheer<br />

extent of the areas of secondary forest now found in most tropical areas<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s that they receive more attention.<br />

Several alternatives are possible depending on the origins of the forest<br />

<strong>and</strong> the range <strong>and</strong> abundance of the species it contains. One option is<br />

to simply protect the forest <strong>and</strong> manage the harvesting of existing<br />

plants <strong>and</strong> animals. This requires care because of the risk that the forest<br />

will degrade further unless harvesting is carefully regulated. On the<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!