14.10.2012 Views

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transport of horses from Spain to Italy Jan. 2006<br />

Furthermore in the route plan there was a stop indicated on the 12.01.06 at 17.00 h for a transport<br />

which starts on 26.01.06.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 5, section A, paragraph 2, lit. b. and c of Council Directive<br />

91/628 ECC as amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC, which requires that the route plan is<br />

duly drawn up. Furthermore a violation of Art. 8, lit. d.) of Council directive 91/629/EEC as<br />

amended by Council directive 95/29 EC<br />

Furthermore it constitutes a violation of Council Directive 96/93 EC on the certification of<br />

animals and animal products. The competent Spanish authority did not all necessary steps to<br />

ensure the integrity of certification as required in Art. 4 of Council Directive 96/93 EC.<br />

Therefore the obligatory unloading at a staging point was not planed and the route plan not duly drawn<br />

up regarding journey times and rest periods (see point 3).<br />

1.2. Regarding inadequate transport conditions. (please see point 2. – 6. )<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 5, section A, paragraph 1, lit.b and lit. c, of Council directive<br />

91/629/EEC as amended by Council directive 95/29 EC<br />

2. Undue suffering caused<br />

Undue suffering was caused to the animals due to inadequate transport conditions.<br />

This represents a violation of Art. 5, paragraph 1, lit. b of Council Directive 91/628 EEC as<br />

amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC.<br />

3. Obligatory unloading at staging point not planned – Route plan not duly drawn up regarding<br />

journey times and rest periods<br />

The route plan did not indicate a staging point, despite the fact that the length of the journey required<br />

it, after a maximum journey time of 24 hours. Further stops to water the horses after 8 hours of travel<br />

time were not indicated in the route plan.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 5, section A, paragraph 2, lit.b and lit.d, (i) first indent of<br />

Council directive 91/629/EEC as amended by Council directive 95/29 EC, as well as a violation<br />

of Art. 3. paragraph 1, lit.aa, second indent of Council directive 91/629/EEC as amended by<br />

Council directive 95/29 EC in connection with Chapter VII, point 4, lit. c and Chapter VII, point 5<br />

of the annex.<br />

4. Exceeded maximum journey time<br />

It is required that horses be unloaded after a maximum journey time of 24 hours to be rested, fed and<br />

watered for at least 24 hours before continuing journey. The lorry left Bernuy de Porreros the 26 th at<br />

9.00 o’clock. The 27 th at 13.00 o’clock the lorry was in a traffic jam near Frejus. At this moment the<br />

horses had already been on board the lorry for 28 hours. Consequently the maximum journey time<br />

was already exceeded by 5 hours. The remaining distance to destination was 1,326 km. According to<br />

the drivers they planned to continue transport directly to destination, without unloading the horses for<br />

rest. No programmed staging point was indicated on the route plan. Therefore, it is very likely, that the<br />

transport was in fact carried out directly to destination. Given the remaining distance the remaining<br />

journey time was approx. 20 hours.<br />

5. Partitions not placed<br />

For journeys exceeding 8 hours the vehicle has to be equipped with partitions. There was only one<br />

partition placed in the trailer.<br />

Place and date of report: Freiburg, 01.03.2006 © Copyright Animals’ Angels e.V.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!