14.10.2012 Views

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

INVESTIGATION INTO TRANSPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS FROM ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transport of pigs from Spain to Italy, 23. - 25.01.2006<br />

3. Obligatory unloading at staging point not programmed – route plan not duly drawn up<br />

regarding journey times and rest periods<br />

It was not programmed to unload and rest the pigs for at least 24 hours at an authorized staging<br />

point after a maximum of 24 hours of transport even though the length of the journey required this.<br />

No programmed staging point was indicated on the route plan.<br />

The actual duration of the transport (44 hours) proves that the estimated journey time of 23 hours<br />

as indicated on route plan and health certificate was entirely unrealistic.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 5, section A, paragraph 2, lit. b and lit. d, first indent of<br />

Council Directive 91/628 EEC as amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC, as well as a<br />

violation of Art. 3, paragraph 1, lit. aa, second indent of Council Directive 91/628 EEC as<br />

amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC in connection with Chapter VII, point 4, lit. b and<br />

Chapter VII, point 5 of the Annex.<br />

4. Maximum permitted journey time exceeded<br />

The pigs were transported for a total of 44 hours.<br />

The transporter did not unload the pigs after the maximum permitted journey time of 24 hours at<br />

an approved staging point for the required rest period of at least 24 hours.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 3 paragraph 1, lit. aa, second indent of Council Directive<br />

91/628 EEC as amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC in connection with Chapter VII, point<br />

4, lit b and point 5 of the Annex.<br />

Please note: Chapter VII, point 7 of the annex to Council Directive 91/628 EEC as amended<br />

by Council Directive 95/29 EC is not applicable, as the permitted journey time of 24 hours<br />

was already exceeded, when the livestock truck embarked the ferry at the port of Piombino.<br />

Therefore is was legally required that the pigs be unloaded and rested at an authorized<br />

staging point before embarking the ferry.<br />

5. No continuous access to water<br />

For transport of pigs continuous access to water is required, if the journey time exceeds 8 hours.<br />

This requirement was not respected as the water system of the truck was found not to be in<br />

working order for at least 9 hours.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 3, paragraph 1, lit. aa, second indent of Council Directive<br />

91/628 EEC as amended by Council directive 95/29 EC in connection with Chapter VII, point<br />

4, lit. b of the annex, as well as a violation of Art. 1 of Council Regulation (EC) 411/98 in<br />

connection with number 6.2 of the annex.<br />

6. Exceeded loading density<br />

The journey from Spain to Sardinia (Italy) includes a sea transport. The space requirements for<br />

sea transport of pigs are considerably higher compared to road transport. Legislation does not<br />

specify the length of the sea transport. Calculated on the basis of an average weight of 100 kg per<br />

pig and the surface indicated on the articulated trailer itself only 105 pigs (89,1 m² : 0,85 m²)<br />

should have been loaded during sea transport. Therefore during sea transport the vehicle was<br />

overloaded by 95 pigs. This calculation is in favour of the transporter, as the average weight of<br />

the pigs was probably more than 100 kg.<br />

The loading density for road transport was also exceeded; on the basis of the surface as indicated<br />

on the articulated trailer itself each pig had a surface of 0,4455 m² at his/her disposal. This is the<br />

approximate minimum requirement for transports by road. In consideration of the long journey time<br />

the surface per pig should have been increased – as it is required by legislation.<br />

This constitutes a violation of Art. 3, paragraph 1, lit. aa, first indent of Council Directive<br />

91/628 EEC as amended by Council Directive 95/29 EC in connection with Chapter VI,<br />

section D of the annex.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

Place and date of report: Freiburg, 04.03.2006 © Copyright Animals’ Angels e.V. ::::::<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!