14.07.2013 Views

The Leyden and Stockholm Papyri - University of Cincinnati

The Leyden and Stockholm Papyri - University of Cincinnati

The Leyden and Stockholm Papyri - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENERAL INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>of</strong> their work, nor confused in these operations to any considerable<br />

extent by metaphysical or mystical ideas.<br />

! If, instead <strong>of</strong> wasting our time fruitlessly speculating about the<br />

unknown authors <strong>and</strong>/or original owners <strong>of</strong> these papyri, we concentrate<br />

instead on their format <strong>and</strong> contents, then it is far more<br />

logical to consider them as a part <strong>of</strong> a tradition <strong>of</strong> practical recipe<br />

books intended for metal workers, jewelers, dyers, <strong>and</strong> artisans,<br />

rather than as proto-alchemical documents – a practical tradition<br />

which extents back in time to the Assyrian cuneiform tablets dealing<br />

with glass recipes, mentioned in the previous section, <strong>and</strong><br />

forward in time through an almost continuous tradition <strong>of</strong> medieval<br />

recipe books intended for artists <strong>and</strong> craftsmen, <strong>of</strong> which the most<br />

famous are the Compositiones variae (c. 790 AD) (19), the Mappae<br />

clavicule (c. 810 AD) (20), the De diversis artibus <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ophilus<br />

(c. 1100) (21), <strong>and</strong> the De coloribus et artibus Romanorum <strong>of</strong><br />

Eraclius (c. 1150). Indeed, the parallels between the <strong>Leyden</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Stockholm</strong> papyri <strong>and</strong> these later medieval recipe books were<br />

briefly noted by von Lippmann as early as 1919 (22), were further<br />

elaborated on by Johnson in the 1930s (19, 25), <strong>and</strong> were also consistently<br />

maintained <strong>and</strong> developed in the writings <strong>of</strong> the late Cyril<br />

Stanley Smith (20, 21). A feel for the richness <strong>of</strong> this later medieval<br />

tradition may be obtained through an examination <strong>of</strong> Clarke’s<br />

recent bibliographic study <strong>of</strong> its surviving manuscript sources (23).<br />

! In keeping with this alternative interpretation, it is also <strong>of</strong><br />

interest to note that Lindsay’s 1970 study <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> alchemy<br />

in Greco-Roman Egypt, unlike Berthelot’s original study <strong>of</strong> 1885,<br />

mentions the <strong>Leyden</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stockholm</strong> papyri only in passing <strong>and</strong><br />

then only in the chapter on “Ancient <strong>and</strong> Contemporary Crafts”<br />

(24). Likewise, the late Robert Multhauf, in his classic monograph<br />

on <strong>The</strong> Origins <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, repeatedly characterized the <strong>Leyden</strong><br />

papyrus as an “Egyptian jeweler’s recipe book” <strong>and</strong> essentially<br />

dismissed the earlier speculations <strong>of</strong> Berthelot concerning secret<br />

priestly monopolies <strong>and</strong> temple rites dealing with goldsmithing <strong>and</strong><br />

metallurgy (25):<br />

<strong>The</strong> older view that goldsmithing was secret work in which the<br />

Egyptian priests themselves were involved is not probable. <strong>The</strong><br />

- 5 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!