15.07.2013 Views

Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) - Courses

Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) - Courses

Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

446 A. Borghesi and G. Guizzetti<br />

in concentrated bromine. In the other cases no description of the surface<br />

treatment was given.<br />

The R values in the infrared from various labs agree to within the experimental<br />

uncertainty. It was determined that differences in the free-carrier concentration<br />

had no effect on R. The n values for A :::::: 50 Jim from Parsons and<br />

Coleman [3] and Abagyan et al. [4] present a difference of 0.28% at A =<br />

50 Jim, which lowers to 0.2% at A = 1000 Jim. In Abagyan et al. [4] the error<br />

fln in n, resulting from the measurement of the sample thickness and of wavelength<br />

A, is quoted not exceeding 0.005, while in Parsons and Coleman [3] n<br />

is quoted with four decimal places and its values are those reported in Table<br />

IV for 50 Jim S; A S; 400 Jim.<br />

Parsons and Coleman [3] fit the infrared data and the accurate n data<br />

from Bond [9] and Nelson and Turner [13] in the 0.5-4.0-Jim range by<br />

using for the complex dielectric function g the following form proposed by<br />

Barker [2]:<br />

i.e., a classical-oscillator equation, where Si' vf, and Yi are the osciIIator<br />

strength, restoring force, and linewidth, respectively. The second term in Eq.<br />

(1) represents the electronic contribution and the third one the lattice contribution<br />

with frequency-dependent damping. The fit parameters, given in<br />

Table III, are the same used by Barker [2] to fit IX, R, and Raman data near<br />

the transverse optic mode, except So, which had to be increased from 2.01 to<br />

2.056 for best fit. The net result of this fit is that the refractive index of GaP<br />

can be calculated from Eq. (1) to an accuracy somewhat better than four<br />

figures from microwave to visible frequencies. In particular, in the range<br />

30-200 Jim the fit agrees with the experimental n to a few units in the fourth<br />

decimal place (±0.03%) and yields the precise value eo = 11.147 for the static<br />

relative dielectric constant. In Table IV we have labeled this fit with nf for<br />

the data of Barker [2].<br />

Also, Pikhtin et al. [7] proposed an analytic dispersion relationship for<br />

n in the 0.5-1000-Jim spectral range; it has only six parameters and is simpler<br />

than Eq. (1) but less accurate (±0.8%). However, it is useful to report it,<br />

since by means of a relation in Pikhtin et al. [7] it has been possible also<br />

to fit spectra at 105 K. The fit parameters are from Pikhtin et al. [7].<br />

For frequencies above or below V T == vo, the k spectrum has considerable<br />

structure and values much higher than those predicted from Eq. (1).<br />

Since the same bands are observed in compensated and uncompensated<br />

samples, they are attributed to absorption by the lattice (combination bands)<br />

[1, 2]. However, the IX spectra from different labs are in qualitative but not<br />

in quantitative agreement. In the 12-20-Jim region we have tabulated the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!