UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NUI Maynooth <strong>Music</strong> Department Undergraduate Handbook 2009-2010<br />
Composition Criteria<br />
Compositions submitted to the <strong>Music</strong> Department will be assessed with regard to<br />
three main areas:<br />
1. Compositional technique<br />
2. The use of forces /resources<br />
3. Notation and presentation issues/ technical quality<br />
These criteria will not necessarily apply with equal weight, subject to the nature of<br />
the submission.<br />
The following table presents a summary of the criteria governing each band of<br />
marks, given the difference of emphasis mentioned above.<br />
Mark Compositional<br />
Technique<br />
70 –<br />
100%<br />
First<br />
Class<br />
60-68%<br />
2:1<br />
50-58%<br />
2:2<br />
45-48%<br />
Third<br />
Class<br />
40-43%<br />
Pass<br />
25-38%<br />
Fail<br />
0-23%<br />
Fail<br />
An innovative,<br />
confident piece<br />
demonstrating great<br />
fluency and<br />
coherence. <strong>Music</strong>al<br />
structures are<br />
clearly articulated.<br />
Strong overall<br />
control. Good<br />
development, clear<br />
structure and sense<br />
of proportion.<br />
Adequate overall<br />
control with some<br />
sense of formal<br />
issues.<br />
A limited number of<br />
ideas within a loose<br />
structure.<br />
Limited in terms of<br />
invention and<br />
structure within the<br />
parameters set.<br />
Level of control fails<br />
to delineate musical<br />
materials. Little or<br />
no evidence of<br />
structure.<br />
Incoherent in terms<br />
of invention and<br />
structure.<br />
Use of<br />
Forces/Resources<br />
Idiomatically written<br />
throughout, with<br />
excellent sensitivity<br />
towards control of<br />
forces.<br />
Solid command of the<br />
medium, with good<br />
attention to practical<br />
issues.<br />
Competently written,<br />
with some exploration,<br />
and understanding of<br />
practical issues.<br />
Competent but lacking<br />
any idiomatic sense.<br />
Shows basic<br />
understanding of<br />
forces but little more.<br />
Lack of understanding<br />
of resources to the<br />
point where resources<br />
are impractical,<br />
unidiomatic, or<br />
misjudged<br />
Too impractical or illconsidered<br />
to be<br />
realised in<br />
performance to a large<br />
degree.<br />
Presentation,<br />
Notation, Technical<br />
Quality<br />
Professional standard<br />
in production of<br />
scores, parts, and/or<br />
audio output.<br />
High standard in the<br />
production of scores,<br />
parts, and/or audio<br />
output.<br />
Production of scores,<br />
parts, and/ or audio<br />
output is competent.<br />
Accurate, but low<br />
standard of scores,<br />
parts, and/or audio<br />
outputs.<br />
Score, parts, and<br />
audio outputs provide<br />
only the most basic<br />
means necessary for<br />
realisation.<br />
Presentation is of a<br />
low standard. Audio<br />
may contain errors,<br />
and notation may be<br />
illiterate or poorly<br />
detailed.<br />
Score is largely<br />
illiterate or illegible;<br />
Audio has severe<br />
technical errors.<br />
30