22.07.2013 Views

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK - Music

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUI Maynooth <strong>Music</strong> Department Undergraduate Handbook 2009-2010<br />

Composition Criteria<br />

Compositions submitted to the <strong>Music</strong> Department will be assessed with regard to<br />

three main areas:<br />

1. Compositional technique<br />

2. The use of forces /resources<br />

3. Notation and presentation issues/ technical quality<br />

These criteria will not necessarily apply with equal weight, subject to the nature of<br />

the submission.<br />

The following table presents a summary of the criteria governing each band of<br />

marks, given the difference of emphasis mentioned above.<br />

Mark Compositional<br />

Technique<br />

70 –<br />

100%<br />

First<br />

Class<br />

60-68%<br />

2:1<br />

50-58%<br />

2:2<br />

45-48%<br />

Third<br />

Class<br />

40-43%<br />

Pass<br />

25-38%<br />

Fail<br />

0-23%<br />

Fail<br />

An innovative,<br />

confident piece<br />

demonstrating great<br />

fluency and<br />

coherence. <strong>Music</strong>al<br />

structures are<br />

clearly articulated.<br />

Strong overall<br />

control. Good<br />

development, clear<br />

structure and sense<br />

of proportion.<br />

Adequate overall<br />

control with some<br />

sense of formal<br />

issues.<br />

A limited number of<br />

ideas within a loose<br />

structure.<br />

Limited in terms of<br />

invention and<br />

structure within the<br />

parameters set.<br />

Level of control fails<br />

to delineate musical<br />

materials. Little or<br />

no evidence of<br />

structure.<br />

Incoherent in terms<br />

of invention and<br />

structure.<br />

Use of<br />

Forces/Resources<br />

Idiomatically written<br />

throughout, with<br />

excellent sensitivity<br />

towards control of<br />

forces.<br />

Solid command of the<br />

medium, with good<br />

attention to practical<br />

issues.<br />

Competently written,<br />

with some exploration,<br />

and understanding of<br />

practical issues.<br />

Competent but lacking<br />

any idiomatic sense.<br />

Shows basic<br />

understanding of<br />

forces but little more.<br />

Lack of understanding<br />

of resources to the<br />

point where resources<br />

are impractical,<br />

unidiomatic, or<br />

misjudged<br />

Too impractical or illconsidered<br />

to be<br />

realised in<br />

performance to a large<br />

degree.<br />

Presentation,<br />

Notation, Technical<br />

Quality<br />

Professional standard<br />

in production of<br />

scores, parts, and/or<br />

audio output.<br />

High standard in the<br />

production of scores,<br />

parts, and/or audio<br />

output.<br />

Production of scores,<br />

parts, and/ or audio<br />

output is competent.<br />

Accurate, but low<br />

standard of scores,<br />

parts, and/or audio<br />

outputs.<br />

Score, parts, and<br />

audio outputs provide<br />

only the most basic<br />

means necessary for<br />

realisation.<br />

Presentation is of a<br />

low standard. Audio<br />

may contain errors,<br />

and notation may be<br />

illiterate or poorly<br />

detailed.<br />

Score is largely<br />

illiterate or illegible;<br />

Audio has severe<br />

technical errors.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!