01.08.2013 Views

Investigation of the optically stimulated luminescence dating method ...

Investigation of the optically stimulated luminescence dating method ...

Investigation of the optically stimulated luminescence dating method ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OSL from quartz 37<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> natural signal. The sensitivity corrected natural OSL signal (open<br />

circle) is slightly lower than <strong>the</strong> corrected regenerated circles. This is owing to <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that <strong>the</strong> regenerative dose employed in <strong>the</strong> experiment was slightly higher than <strong>the</strong> natural<br />

dose.<br />

Knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal treatments (both in nature and in <strong>the</strong> laboratory) on<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>luminescence</strong> efficiency has revolutionised optical <strong>dating</strong> technology over <strong>the</strong> last few<br />

years. It can finally be pointed out, however, that an exact mechanism explaining<br />

sensitivity changes in quartz remains to be established. Some relevant studies <strong>of</strong> this<br />

matter are those by Zimmerman (1971), Aitken (1998), Wintle and Murray (1999), Chen<br />

and Li (2000), Vartanian et al. (2000) and Bailey (2001, 2002).<br />

OSL signal (counts / 0.16 s)<br />

12000<br />

11000<br />

10000<br />

9000<br />

8000<br />

7000<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Measurement Cycle<br />

, X 3<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Figure 2.11: Illustration <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>the</strong> sensitivity change by <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OSL response to a small test<br />

dose given after every OSL measurement. The sample is <strong>the</strong> same as in Figure 2.10. After <strong>the</strong> natural<br />

signal was removed, <strong>the</strong> aliquot was put through a repeated identical cycle <strong>of</strong> irradiation (~11 Gy),<br />

preheat (10 s at 160°C) and OSL measurement (40 s 470 nm at 125°C). After each principal OSL<br />

measurement, a small test dose (~2.4 Gy) was administered and <strong>the</strong> corresponding OSL response recorded<br />

(after a 160°C cut heat; see Chapter 3). Shown in <strong>the</strong> graph on <strong>the</strong> left are <strong>the</strong> absolute intensities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

main OSL signals (squares) and test dose OSL signals (diamonds; note that for clarity, <strong>the</strong>se values have<br />

been multiplied by three). The change in sensitivity is clear, and is closely followed by <strong>the</strong> test dose signals.<br />

The signals appropriate to <strong>the</strong> natural OSL signal are represented by <strong>the</strong> open symbols. The right hand<br />

figure shows <strong>the</strong> result when allowance is made for <strong>the</strong> sensitivity change, which is accomplished by<br />

normalising each OSL measurement to its appropriate sensitivity. The effectiveness is clearly illustrated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> fact that all points now lie on <strong>the</strong> dashed line representing <strong>the</strong> average. Note that <strong>the</strong> natural datapoint<br />

falls slightly under <strong>the</strong> line, as <strong>the</strong> naturally accumulated dose in <strong>the</strong> quartz grains <strong>of</strong> this aliquot<br />

was a slightly lower than <strong>the</strong> dose <strong>of</strong> ~11Gy used in <strong>the</strong> repeat cycles.<br />

Sensitivity Corrected OSL<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Measurement Cycle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!