05.08.2013 Views

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Methodology<br />

The methodology developed for this study is based on Bates (1995) ACTIONS<br />

model for assessing <strong>the</strong> strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> learning technologies:<br />

A Access: how accessible is a particular technology for learners? How<br />

flexible is it for a particular target group?<br />

C <strong>Costs</strong>: what is <strong>the</strong> cost structure <strong>of</strong> each technology? What is <strong>the</strong> unit<br />

cost per learner?<br />

T Teaching <strong>and</strong> learning: what kinds <strong>of</strong> learning are needed? What<br />

instructional approaches will best meet <strong>the</strong>se needs? What are <strong>the</strong> best<br />

technologies for supporting this teaching <strong>and</strong> learning?<br />

I Interactivity <strong>and</strong> user-friendliness: what kind <strong>of</strong> interaction does this<br />

technology enable? How easy is it to use?<br />

O Organizational issues: what are <strong>the</strong> organizational requirements, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> barriers to be removed, before this technology can be used<br />

successfully? What changes in organization need to be made?<br />

N Novelty: how new is this technology?<br />

S Speed: how quickly can courses be mounted with this technology?<br />

How quickly can materials be changed? (Bates, 1995, pp. 1-2,<br />

emphasis added)<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> this project, Cukier (1997) reviewed existing cost-benefit<br />

methodologies which have been used to assess educational technologies <strong>and</strong> suggested an<br />

approach to be used for this NCE-<strong>Telelearning</strong> project. Based on this approach, <strong>the</strong><br />

following cost <strong>and</strong> benefit factors are examined:<br />

<strong>Costs</strong>. Cost measures assessed in this study include:<br />

• capital <strong>and</strong> recurrent costs,<br />

• production <strong>and</strong> delivery costs, <strong>and</strong><br />

• fixed <strong>and</strong> variable costs.<br />

Capital costs are <strong>the</strong> expenses associated with <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> equipment <strong>and</strong><br />

materials. Recurrent or operating costs are expenses that occur on a regular basis (e.g.<br />

yearly) in order to run a program. An example would be computer support costs involved<br />

in <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> a course. As <strong>the</strong>ir names suggest, production <strong>and</strong> delivery costs are <strong>the</strong><br />

costs associated with <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> a particular course/program. In<br />

traditional, face to face instruction, <strong>the</strong>se costs are usually combined as <strong>the</strong> instructor<br />

both prepares <strong>and</strong> delivers lectures. These costs are unlikely to change significantly from<br />

year to year. For distance education courses however, <strong>the</strong>se costs must be analyzed<br />

separately as <strong>the</strong>re can be large differences in <strong>the</strong>se costs from year to year. Generally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> initial production costs are high but <strong>the</strong>n tend to be quite low in subsequent years<br />

(when revisions are minimal). Delivery costs can, however, stay at <strong>the</strong> same level each<br />

year (or course <strong>of</strong>fering). Fixed costs are costs that do not change with output (<strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> students taking <strong>the</strong> course), while variable costs do. This distinction between<br />

fixed <strong>and</strong> variable costs is important when comparing technologies or in determining <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> students necessary to justify <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a particular technology as different<br />

technologies have different proportions <strong>of</strong> fixed to variable costs (see Bates, 1995 for<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r explanation).<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!