05.08.2013 Views

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Telelearning: A Case Study ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 15<br />

Main Cost Findings<br />

Findings<br />

• The use <strong>of</strong> WebCSILE s<strong>of</strong>tware ra<strong>the</strong>r than Parti s<strong>of</strong>tware decreased tutorial <strong>and</strong><br />

student support time by half.<br />

• As this course was revised from an existing online course, course development costs<br />

were minimal.<br />

• There were no s<strong>of</strong>tware costs as WebCSILE was developed at OISE/UT.<br />

• Overhead costs are unknown as no system <strong>of</strong> keeping track <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se costs is currently<br />

in place. Future policy <strong>and</strong> plans around funding for online courses are currently<br />

being developed.<br />

• Based on <strong>the</strong> researched costs, revenue, <strong>and</strong> student enrollment, annual pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

obtained for this course is $1,962.<br />

• Annual break-even enrollment for this course, based on <strong>the</strong> projected costs, revenues,<br />

<strong>and</strong> student enrollment over 5 years is 5.31 students. (This would increase with <strong>the</strong><br />

inclusion on <strong>the</strong> unknown overhead costs).<br />

• Students thought <strong>the</strong> course was worth <strong>the</strong> money it cost <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

• The costing methodology developed provided an accurate means <strong>of</strong> measuring <strong>the</strong><br />

full direct costs <strong>of</strong> online courses in a real context.<br />

Section C: <strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>and</strong> Limitations<br />

<strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>and</strong> limitations found for this course will be presented according to Bates<br />

(1995) ACTIONS model, (C=<strong>Costs</strong>, which have already been discussed). Results are<br />

based on both quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data.<br />

Access<br />

Students were asked two questions regarding access to <strong>and</strong> flexibility <strong>of</strong> this<br />

course: 1. "If this course was not <strong>of</strong>fered in this delivery method, I would be unable to<br />

complete it", <strong>and</strong> 2. "I like this delivery method because it gives me flexibility in my<br />

studies (e.g. time, place, location)". Responses are based on a five point Likert type scale<br />

(1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) <strong>and</strong> are shown in Table 16.<br />

Table 16<br />

Student Response to Access <strong>and</strong> Flexibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Research Methods Course<br />

Statement<br />

Unable to complete<br />

<strong>the</strong> course without<br />

online delivery<br />

Response<br />

Distributions<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Students<br />

Mean St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Deviation<br />

SD SA<br />

Responding<br />

0 2 1 2 9 14 4.29 1.14<br />

Flexibility 1 0 0 3 10 14 4.50 1.09<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!