Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 94 of 130<br />
CLUB OF ADULTERY<br />
Abdur Rahman Misri, the erstwhile sycophant, gave this statement in the High Court at<br />
Lahore:<br />
"The present Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud, is extremely immoral. He hunts women under the<br />
guise of sainthood. For this purpose he has kept some men and women as his agents.<br />
Through them, he gets hold of innocent girls and boys. He has formed a club in which<br />
men and women have been taken in and adultery is committed in this social gettogether".<br />
PRAYERS OFFERED IN UNBATHED DIFILED STATE<br />
Abdul Rahman Misri also wrote this in a letter addressed to Mirza Mahmud:<br />
"I cannot offer prayers behind you because through different sources it has come to my<br />
knowledge that sometimes you come sin-polluted, and lead prayers in an unbathed lewd<br />
condition".<br />
Because of these gross charges, Mirza Mahmud lost courage to face Abdur Rahman<br />
Misri. Readily seen conclusion is that limb by limb. joint by joint and pore by pore,<br />
Mirza Mahmud was a filthy person. Can any sensible person doubt the impure nasty<br />
fermentation of his base elements.<br />
TWENTY EIGHT EVIDENCES ON OATH BY QADIANI MEN AND<br />
WOMEN<br />
Mirza Tahir! Some dissenters rebelled from your Organisation. They constituted a group,<br />
calling themselves 'Haqiqat-Pasand.' They subjected Mirza Mahmud with serious<br />
allegations of shameful wickedness. They wrote a book, named Tarikh-e-Mahmoodiat in<br />
which they produced evidences. administered on oath, by 28 Qadiani men and women, on<br />
pain of divine wrath if they were false. In these affidavits, they wrote that Mirza tore<br />
chastity of those girls whom he called his daughters and his wife committed sins of<br />
fornication while he knew of them. In this book, the accusers challenged Mirza Mahmud<br />
for a 'Mubahala' and he was asked to swear on pain of punishment from Allah falling on<br />
him that he was not an adulterer. Mirza failed to appear in the 'Mubahala'.<br />
MIRZA MAHMUD HAD NO REPLY FOR THE CHARGES<br />
Rahat Malik, in his book, Rabwah Ka Mazhabi Aamir and Shafiq Mirza, in his Shahr e<br />
Sadoom and Mirza Mahmud Hussain, in his publication Munkireen e Khatme Nubuwwat<br />
Ka Anjam have enumerated similar charges. Each time, Mirza Mahmud was asked to<br />
deny, on pain of Divine punishment on the liar, but he never responded. He was as silent<br />
as a dead body. Rather he issued a 'Farman' forbidding his simple believers--the guileless<br />
folks--from reading the aforesaid books. Will sensible people not conclude from this that<br />
Mirza Mahmud's perimeter of morality was no less different than what was written in<br />
those books?<br />
Mirza Tahir! Are you embarking on this 'Mubahala' with the Ulema of the Ummat with<br />
so much of shamelessness attached with your family and ancestry?