Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds
Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds
Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3932 Johnsen and Knutsen<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a summary of the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Johnsen and<br />
Knutsen (2001) that we will need <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce we only need<br />
those results for ample L, we restrict to this case and refer the reader<br />
to Johnsen and Knutsen (2001) for the results when L is only assumed<br />
to be base po<strong>in</strong>t free.<br />
Proposition 5.1. Let L be an ample l<strong>in</strong>e bundle of sectional genus g 4on<br />
g 1<br />
a K3 surface S and let c :¼ Cliff L. Assume that c < b 2 c. Then c is equal to<br />
the m<strong>in</strong>imal <strong>in</strong>teger k 0 such that there is a l<strong>in</strong>e bundle D on S satisfy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the numerical conditions:<br />
ðiÞ<br />
2<br />
2D L:D ¼ D 2 þ k þ 2 ðiiÞ<br />
2k þ 4<br />
with equality <strong>in</strong> (i) or (ii) if and only if L 2D and L 2 ¼ 4k þ 8. (In particular,<br />
D 2<br />
c þ 2, with equality if and only if L 2D and L 2 ¼ 4c þ 8, and<br />
by the Hodge <strong>in</strong>dex theorem<br />
D 2 L 2<br />
ðL:DÞ 2 ¼ðD 2 þ c þ 2Þ 2 :Þ<br />
Moreover, any such D satisfies (with M :¼ L D and R :¼ L 2D):<br />
(i) D.M ¼ c þ 2.<br />
(ii) D.L M.L (equivalently D 2 M 2 ).<br />
(iii) h 1 (D) ¼ h 1 (M) ¼ 0.<br />
(iv) jDj and jMj are base po<strong>in</strong>t free and their generic members are<br />
smooth curves.<br />
(v) h 1 (R) ¼ 0, R 2<br />
4, and h 0 (R) > 0 if and only if R 2<br />
2.<br />
(vi) If R R1 þ R2 is a nontrivial effective decomposition, then<br />
R1.R2 > 0.<br />
Proof. The first statement is Knutsen (2001a, Lemma 8.3). The properties<br />
(i)–(iv) are the properties (C1)–(C5) <strong>in</strong> Johnsen and Knutsen (2001,<br />
p. 9–10), under the additional condition that L is ample. The fact that<br />
h 1 (R) ¼ 0 <strong>in</strong> (v) follows from Johnsen and Knutsen (2001, Prop. 5.5)<br />
(where D ¼ 0 s<strong>in</strong>ce L is ample), and the rest of (v) is then an immediate<br />
consequence of Riemann-Roch. F<strong>in</strong>ally, (vi) follows from Johnsen and<br />
Knutsen (2001, Prop. 6.6) s<strong>in</strong>ce L is ample. &<br />
Now denote by fL the morphism<br />
f L : S !P g