10.08.2013 Views

Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds

Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds

Rational Curves in Calabi-Yau Threefolds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3922 Johnsen and Knutsen<br />

or (1, 1, 1, 1, 2), and any <strong>in</strong>teger d > 0, there exists a smooth rational curve<br />

C of degree d <strong>in</strong> F with NCjF ¼ OP1( 1) OP1( 1) (which gives<br />

h 0 (NCjF) ¼ 0). For the types (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) and (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) we know<br />

of no such result.<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>iteness question seems hard to handle <strong>in</strong> all these cases. Let Id be the <strong>in</strong>cidence of C and complete <strong>in</strong>tersection F. Denote by a the projection<br />

to the parameter space Md,k,n of po<strong>in</strong>ts [C] represent<strong>in</strong>g smooth<br />

rational curves C of degree d <strong>in</strong> G(k, n), and by b the projection to the<br />

parameter space of complete <strong>in</strong>tersections of the G(k, n) <strong>in</strong> question. A<br />

natural strategy is to look at each fixed rational curve C and study the<br />

fibre a 1 ([C]). If the dimension of all such fibres can be controlled, so<br />

can dim Id. A way to ga<strong>in</strong> partial control is the follow<strong>in</strong>g: Let M be a subscheme<br />

of Md,k,n, with dim M ¼ m, and assume that dim a 1 ([C]) ¼ c is<br />

constant on M. Then of course this gives rise to a part a 1 (M) ofIdwhich has dimension c þ m. Ifcþm dim G, one concludes that, for a general<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t [g] ofG, there is only a f<strong>in</strong>ite set of po<strong>in</strong>ts from a 1 (M) <strong>in</strong>b 1 ([g]).<br />

More ref<strong>in</strong>ed arguments may reveal that <strong>in</strong> many such cases a 1 (M) is<br />

irreducible.<br />

An obvious argument shows that if M is the subscheme of<br />

M(d, k, n) correspond<strong>in</strong>g to rational normal curves of degree d, then<br />

dim a 1 ([C]) is constant on M. Moreover the constant value is<br />

c ¼ dim G dim Md,k,n ¼ dim G ((n þ 1)d þ (k þ 1)(n k) 3). Of course<br />

the rational normal curves for fixed n, k only occur for (low) d N r,<br />

where G(k, n) is embedded <strong>in</strong> P N ,andris the number of i with ai ¼ 1.<br />

(One observes that N r ¼ maxfdjdim G dim Md,k,n 0g for the cases<br />

<strong>in</strong> category (a), but N r < maxfdjdim G dim Md,k,n 0g for the cases<br />

<strong>in</strong> category (b).)<br />

For d ¼ 1, 2, 3 the only smooth rational curves of degree d are the<br />

rational, normal ones. In Osland (2001) it was shown for all five cases<br />

that Id is irreducible for d ¼ 1, 2, 3, and that on a general F there is no s<strong>in</strong>gular<br />

(plane) cubic curve on F. In a similar way, one can show that on a<br />

general F there is no pair of <strong>in</strong>tersect<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es, and no l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tersect<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

conic and no double l<strong>in</strong>e. For the complete <strong>in</strong>tersection types of category<br />

(b), one then has:<br />

Proposition 3.1. (i) Let d 3, and let F be a general threefold of a given<br />

type as described above. In the Hilbert scheme of F, form the open subscheme<br />

of rational, smooth and irreducible curves C of degree d. Then this<br />

subscheme is f<strong>in</strong>ite, nonempty, and reduced; <strong>in</strong> fact, each C is embedded <strong>in</strong> F<br />

with normal bundle OP1( 1) OP1( 1). Moreover, there are no s<strong>in</strong>gular<br />

curves (reducible or irreducible) of degree d <strong>in</strong> F. We have dim Id ¼ dim G,<br />

and Id is irreducible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!