11.08.2013 Views

Smoke, Fire and Fumes in Transport Aircraft - Royal Aeronautical ...

Smoke, Fire and Fumes in Transport Aircraft - Royal Aeronautical ...

Smoke, Fire and Fumes in Transport Aircraft - Royal Aeronautical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.6 Pr<strong>in</strong>t size Is the checklist legible at arms’ length? Text must be legible under all light<strong>in</strong>g conditions at<br />

arms length (approximately 600mm). Smaller text<br />

will cause eye fatigue <strong>and</strong> may not be legible<br />

particularly <strong>in</strong> low visibility conditions. Recommend<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease font size until it is legible at 600mm.<br />

1.8 Emphasis <strong>and</strong><br />

differentiation<br />

1.10 Contents list <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dex<br />

Are the smoke procedures <strong>in</strong> large pr<strong>in</strong>t? (Also<br />

consider any procedures that may be carried out<br />

under poor light<strong>in</strong>g conditions.)<br />

1.7 Marg<strong>in</strong>s Does the b<strong>in</strong>der obscure any of the text? The b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g should not hide the text. Recommend<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> to typically 19mm.<br />

Can you use your thumb as a cursor to keep track<br />

of drill progress?<br />

Are similar action items on the checklist clearly<br />

differentiated?<br />

1.9 Contrast <strong>and</strong> colour Has black text on a white or yellow background<br />

been used?<br />

When the Emergency <strong>and</strong> Abnormal procedures<br />

are <strong>in</strong> the Operat<strong>in</strong>g Manual are the pages<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished from the ma<strong>in</strong> drills?<br />

Where colour shad<strong>in</strong>g has been used to<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>ate actions or notes, is there sufficient<br />

contrast between the text <strong>and</strong> background?<br />

Does the checklist have a tabbed content list at the<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the checklist?<br />

Does the contents list clearly identify the subsystems?<br />

Does the checklist have an <strong>in</strong>dex of all fault<br />

captions covered <strong>in</strong> the checklist?<br />

It should be possible to hold the list us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

thumb as a cursor without obscur<strong>in</strong>g the text.<br />

Recommend chang<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> to typically 19mm.<br />

Similar l<strong>in</strong>es of text could result <strong>in</strong> an action item<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g missed. Recommend highlight<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> the sentence us<strong>in</strong>g bold type.<br />

Coloured backgrounds provide a poor contrast<br />

ratio, which is difficult to read. Recommend us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

white or yellow background. If other colours are<br />

used check legibility under low ambient light<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Is all the text <strong>in</strong> black? Coloured text is difficult to read particularly under<br />

low ambient light<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>and</strong> should be<br />

avoided. Recommend chang<strong>in</strong>g coloured text back<br />

to black. Alert cues may be coloured (see 2.4).<br />

It is important to be able to quickly <strong>and</strong> accurately<br />

locate the correct drill. Recommend us<strong>in</strong>g colour<br />

tabs — red for emergency <strong>and</strong> amber for abnormal<br />

procedures.<br />

Colour shad<strong>in</strong>g provides a good method of<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>ation but must be used with care.<br />

Recommend the use of pastel colours (low<br />

saturation) for shad<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The checklist is unusable without a contents list.<br />

Recommend add<strong>in</strong>g a contents list (see CAP 676<br />

Appendix 3, Example 1).<br />

The pilots should be tra<strong>in</strong>ed to know <strong>in</strong> which subsystem<br />

the fault has occurred. Recommend clearly<br />

list<strong>in</strong>g each sub-system (see CAP 676 Appendix 3,<br />

Example 1).<br />

Are critical drills highlighted <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex? The critical drills need to be attended to very<br />

rapidly. Recommend highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some manner<br />

to make these drills easier to f<strong>in</strong>d. Alternatively put<br />

the critical drills at the top of the <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

Is there a contents list at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of each<br />

sub-system section of the checklist?<br />

Font size should be large enough to be legible <strong>in</strong> a<br />

smoke filled cab<strong>in</strong>. Recommend <strong>in</strong>crease size of<br />

font.<br />

An alphabetical <strong>in</strong>dex will provide a quick route to<br />

the correct drill particularly when the Pilot is<br />

unfamiliar with the fault <strong>and</strong> does not know which<br />

sub-system to try first. Recommend <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

alphabetical <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

Lack of a list can make the checklist unusable.<br />

Recommend putt<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dex at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

each sub-system section.<br />

FEBRUARY 2007 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!