12.08.2013 Views

International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative

International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative

International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Managing Resources<br />

Policymakers should set inspection fees at levels that will support costs of the<br />

recommended design of I/M programs set forth here, i.e., privately operated testonly<br />

centers with strong oversight <strong>and</strong> quality assurance components. Although<br />

the resulting fees may appear high, they are likely to be affordable to the citizens<br />

that own vehicles. Subsidies of initial capital costs for l<strong>and</strong> or fixed facilities could be<br />

considered but inspection fees absolutely must cover ongoing operating costs.<br />

Policymakers should ensure that all the actors in an I/M program have the<br />

capacity to carry out their roles, paying special attention to the vehicle service<br />

sector. Policymakers often neglect the critical task of building capacity to provide the<br />

“M”–the maintenance <strong>and</strong> repairs for vehicles that fail I/M tests. Donors <strong>and</strong> vehicle<br />

manufacturers are often willing to provide training <strong>and</strong> policymakers should seek their<br />

involvement in capacity-building in the vehicle service sector.<br />

6.2. <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practices</strong><br />

Additional “ordinary” best practices fall in the same four categories noted above. All can<br />

improve I/M program effectiveness.<br />

Institutional design<br />

Policymakers should consider the following practices in engaging private<br />

contractors to assist in implementing I/M programs:<br />

• In order to bring their expertise <strong>and</strong> capital, encourage international I/M firms to<br />

partner with local firms in the bidding process.<br />

• Make awards to a single firm (rather than multiple firms) operating within a<br />

jurisdiction (i.e., state or metropolitan region). Encourage competition by making<br />

awards in more than one jurisdiction, <strong>and</strong> by ensuring that an incumbent firm<br />

does not have an unfair advantage when re-bidding a concession.<br />

• Contract lengths should be seven years or longer.<br />

• Provide for appropriate inflation-indexing or wage-indexing of inspection fees.<br />

• Consider government ownership of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> buildings for test-only I/M centers,<br />

either at the outset or at the end of the first concession.<br />

• Provide appropriate risk management contract provisions to account for the<br />

possibility of the actual number of inspections being far different from the forecast<br />

number.<br />

National policymakers should establish an I/M policy framework; state <strong>and</strong><br />

local governments should tailor some program details within this framework to<br />

address specific conditions within regions or cities. The I/M framework should<br />

be part of a larger policy framework that addresses vehicle emissions in an integrated<br />

manner. I/M program elements should account for new vehicle emission st<strong>and</strong>ards,<br />

equipment warranties, <strong>and</strong> fuel st<strong>and</strong>ards, all of which are typically set at the national<br />

level. Coordination improves I/M effectiveness.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!