International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative
International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative
International Experience and Best Practices - Clean Air Initiative
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Managing Resources<br />
Policymakers should set inspection fees at levels that will support costs of the<br />
recommended design of I/M programs set forth here, i.e., privately operated testonly<br />
centers with strong oversight <strong>and</strong> quality assurance components. Although<br />
the resulting fees may appear high, they are likely to be affordable to the citizens<br />
that own vehicles. Subsidies of initial capital costs for l<strong>and</strong> or fixed facilities could be<br />
considered but inspection fees absolutely must cover ongoing operating costs.<br />
Policymakers should ensure that all the actors in an I/M program have the<br />
capacity to carry out their roles, paying special attention to the vehicle service<br />
sector. Policymakers often neglect the critical task of building capacity to provide the<br />
“M”–the maintenance <strong>and</strong> repairs for vehicles that fail I/M tests. Donors <strong>and</strong> vehicle<br />
manufacturers are often willing to provide training <strong>and</strong> policymakers should seek their<br />
involvement in capacity-building in the vehicle service sector.<br />
6.2. <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practices</strong><br />
Additional “ordinary” best practices fall in the same four categories noted above. All can<br />
improve I/M program effectiveness.<br />
Institutional design<br />
Policymakers should consider the following practices in engaging private<br />
contractors to assist in implementing I/M programs:<br />
• In order to bring their expertise <strong>and</strong> capital, encourage international I/M firms to<br />
partner with local firms in the bidding process.<br />
• Make awards to a single firm (rather than multiple firms) operating within a<br />
jurisdiction (i.e., state or metropolitan region). Encourage competition by making<br />
awards in more than one jurisdiction, <strong>and</strong> by ensuring that an incumbent firm<br />
does not have an unfair advantage when re-bidding a concession.<br />
• Contract lengths should be seven years or longer.<br />
• Provide for appropriate inflation-indexing or wage-indexing of inspection fees.<br />
• Consider government ownership of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> buildings for test-only I/M centers,<br />
either at the outset or at the end of the first concession.<br />
• Provide appropriate risk management contract provisions to account for the<br />
possibility of the actual number of inspections being far different from the forecast<br />
number.<br />
National policymakers should establish an I/M policy framework; state <strong>and</strong><br />
local governments should tailor some program details within this framework to<br />
address specific conditions within regions or cities. The I/M framework should<br />
be part of a larger policy framework that addresses vehicle emissions in an integrated<br />
manner. I/M program elements should account for new vehicle emission st<strong>and</strong>ards,<br />
equipment warranties, <strong>and</strong> fuel st<strong>and</strong>ards, all of which are typically set at the national<br />
level. Coordination improves I/M effectiveness.<br />
79