Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.10 Following a development in Scotland, we also want to recognise demands placed<br />
upon relatives or others who look after elderly, ill or disabled people. It is often<br />
easier to provide the level of care required if the carer moves into the home of the<br />
vulnerable person. Many carers find it impossible to maintain their own home if<br />
they do this. Our recommendations recognise the reality of the sacrifices that<br />
carers make by protecting the position of unpaid carers who give up their own<br />
home to care for another in that other person’s home.<br />
7.11 At present, the succession rights for secure tenants in the Housing Act 1985<br />
preclude succession to a spouse being followed by a succession of another<br />
member of the family, even if that person has lived with the tenant for all of their<br />
life. We think this is too restricted.<br />
7.12 Some community landlords are concerned that the effect of these<br />
recommendations will unnecessarily restrict their ability to rent to those most in<br />
housing need. We think these fears are unlikely to be realised in practice. In<br />
Scotland, where similar rules have existed since 2001, experience is that<br />
relatively few social tenancies pass under the succession rules. Further, we<br />
recommend the estate management ground for possession (see below). In<br />
addition, it is known that under the present more restrictive rules, where<br />
succession is a genuine issue, it can generate significant levels of complaint to<br />
Members of Parliament. Our recommendations strike a better balance between<br />
the legitimate concerns of community landlords and the needs of individual<br />
occupiers.<br />
<strong>The</strong> passing of the contract on death<br />
7.13 Our scheme recognises the possibility of passing a contract on to one’s children,<br />
though ensuring that this is done within sensible constraints of estate<br />
management. We believe that it should be possible to protect the normal<br />
expectations of a family within rented housing, that the partner and then a child of<br />
the family, if they have not set up home elsewhere, should be able to succeed to<br />
the occupation contract.<br />
7.14 To achieve this outcome, the scheme provides a limited number of ways in which<br />
an occupation contract can be passed to another person following the death of a<br />
contract-holder. Subject to two exceptions, we recommend that our scheme of<br />
statutory succession should be the only way that someone can succeed to an<br />
occupation contract.<br />
7.15 <strong>The</strong> two exceptions are:<br />
(1) where there is a surviving joint contract-holder, when the right to occupy<br />
passes by operation of the principle of survivorship; 9 or<br />
(2) where there is a fixed term agreement, which, if the contract specifically<br />
provides for it, can be transmitted by will or intestacy. 10<br />
9 Discussed above, at paras 7.4 to 7.7.<br />
10 See cls 133 and 136 discussed below, at paras 7.31 to 7.33.<br />
119