Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.37 <strong>The</strong>re is also power to define circumstances in which the unfair terms regulations<br />
do not apply to a term of an occupation contract, or where the landlord may not<br />
rely on the terms of the occupation contract. In these cases, the regulations may<br />
also provide for the terms which are to apply in those circumstances. 25<br />
1.38 Fundamental provisions incorporated as terms of the occupation contract, and<br />
supplementary provisions incorporated as terms without modification, cannot be<br />
challenged under the unfair terms regulations as unfair. 26 Only additional terms or<br />
supplementary provisions which are incorporated as terms with modifications, will<br />
be subject to challenge as being unfair. <strong>The</strong>se recommendations address<br />
concerns expressed to us by many landlords that they did not know exactly<br />
where they stood in relation to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts<br />
Regulations 1999 and the interpretation of those regulations, in particular by the<br />
Office of Fair Trading. 27<br />
DEVELOPING THE SCHEME: CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY<br />
1.39 From the start, we were asked to assume that the disposition of rights and<br />
obligations, and the balance of rights and obligations as between landlords and<br />
occupiers, that existed under the current law should remain broadly the same. In<br />
particular, changes to the regulation of the private rented sector introduced by the<br />
Housing Acts of 1988 and 1996 should be retained.<br />
1.40 As with all <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> projects, we consulted widely in developing our<br />
recommendations. We received over four hundred written submissions to our two<br />
Consultation Papers; and we spoke at numerous public meetings with landlords<br />
and tenants, lawyers and advisers, policy makers and administrators, and others<br />
interested in this area of housing policy. 28 We wanted to build as much<br />
agreement as possible about both the approach and the detail of our<br />
recommendations. Analyses of the responses to our two Consultation Papers will<br />
be made available to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, and published on<br />
the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> website.<br />
1.41 Many of our initial ideas and thoughts were altered in the light of these<br />
responses. We have radically changed our thinking on the regulation of<br />
supported housing, where initially we failed to understand how that part of the<br />
housing market really operates. We did not pursue suggestions to abolish the<br />
suspended possession order, though we retain the idea of giving the Secretary of<br />
State power to pilot alternative forms of procedure for dealing with rent arrears.<br />
We amended our views on how to manage anti-social behaviour in the specific<br />
housing context (though this has been an area where law and policy has<br />
developed rapidly in any event).<br />
25 Cls 205(2)(b) to (d).<br />
26 See below, at paras 3.44 and 3.46.<br />
27 <strong>The</strong> uncertainties currently facing many landlords are revealed in the Office of Fair Trading<br />
<strong>Report</strong> Guidance in Unfair Terms in Tenancy Agreements Revised ed. Sept 2005.<br />
28 See <strong>Renting</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> (2003) <strong>Law</strong> Com No 284, Annexes C and D at<br />
http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/lc284.pdf and above n 1.<br />
19