Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.53 In accordance with the “use it or lose it” principle, there are fundamental terms<br />
providing that a possession claim cannot be brought more than six months from<br />
the date on which the possession notice was given. 66 Once that time has<br />
elapsed, proceedings cannot be brought until after a new possession notice is<br />
given.<br />
Effect of possession order<br />
Removing the tolerated trespasser<br />
4.54 One of the problems with the current law is that, where a suspended possession<br />
order is made, and the tenant breaks one of the terms of that order (such as to<br />
pay arrears of rent), this brings the tenancy to an end, by operation of law. In<br />
practice, the former tenant often carries on living in the premises. <strong>The</strong> former<br />
tenant then enters a form of legal limbo – living there, but with no specific<br />
contractual entitlement to be there.<br />
4.55 <strong>The</strong> courts have dealt with this by creating a new form of legal status – the<br />
“tolerated trespasser”. 67 In legal logic, this is an impossibility; a trespasser by<br />
definition has no rights to be on the land and therefore cannot be tolerated. We<br />
want to abolish this troublesome concept.<br />
4.56 <strong>The</strong> Bill provides that, where a court has made a possession order, the contract<br />
comes to an end:<br />
(1) where the contract-holder gives up possession of the premises on or<br />
before the date specified in the order, on that specified date;<br />
(2) where the contract-holder gives up possession of the premises after the<br />
date specified in the order but before the order is formally executed, on<br />
the date the contract-holder gives up possession;<br />
(3) where the contract-holder does not give up possession of the premises<br />
until the order is executed, on the date when the order is executed. 68<br />
(4) where the court makes a possession order against joint contract-holders,<br />
and it is a condition of the order that the landlord offers a new contract of<br />
the same premises to one or more (but not all) of them, the occupation<br />
contract in respect of which the possession order is made comes to an<br />
end immediately before the effective date of the new contract. 69<br />
66 Cls 169(3), 184(4), 186(2)(b) and 188(2)(b).<br />
67 Burrows v Brent LBC [1996] 4 All ER 577, by Lord Browne-Wilkinson at 584.<br />
68 Cl 154(1).<br />
69 Cl 154(2) and (3). Further principles relating to the termination of occupation contracts with<br />
joint contract-holders are discussed below at para 4.84 onwards.<br />
75