15.08.2013 Views

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.53 In accordance with the “use it or lose it” principle, there are fundamental terms<br />

providing that a possession claim cannot be brought more than six months from<br />

the date on which the possession notice was given. 66 Once that time has<br />

elapsed, proceedings cannot be brought until after a new possession notice is<br />

given.<br />

Effect of possession order<br />

Removing the tolerated trespasser<br />

4.54 One of the problems with the current law is that, where a suspended possession<br />

order is made, and the tenant breaks one of the terms of that order (such as to<br />

pay arrears of rent), this brings the tenancy to an end, by operation of law. In<br />

practice, the former tenant often carries on living in the premises. <strong>The</strong> former<br />

tenant then enters a form of legal limbo – living there, but with no specific<br />

contractual entitlement to be there.<br />

4.55 <strong>The</strong> courts have dealt with this by creating a new form of legal status – the<br />

“tolerated trespasser”. 67 In legal logic, this is an impossibility; a trespasser by<br />

definition has no rights to be on the land and therefore cannot be tolerated. We<br />

want to abolish this troublesome concept.<br />

4.56 <strong>The</strong> Bill provides that, where a court has made a possession order, the contract<br />

comes to an end:<br />

(1) where the contract-holder gives up possession of the premises on or<br />

before the date specified in the order, on that specified date;<br />

(2) where the contract-holder gives up possession of the premises after the<br />

date specified in the order but before the order is formally executed, on<br />

the date the contract-holder gives up possession;<br />

(3) where the contract-holder does not give up possession of the premises<br />

until the order is executed, on the date when the order is executed. 68<br />

(4) where the court makes a possession order against joint contract-holders,<br />

and it is a condition of the order that the landlord offers a new contract of<br />

the same premises to one or more (but not all) of them, the occupation<br />

contract in respect of which the possession order is made comes to an<br />

end immediately before the effective date of the new contract. 69<br />

66 Cls 169(3), 184(4), 186(2)(b) and 188(2)(b).<br />

67 Burrows v Brent LBC [1996] 4 All ER 577, by Lord Browne-Wilkinson at 584.<br />

68 Cl 154(1).<br />

69 Cl 154(2) and (3). Further principles relating to the termination of occupation contracts with<br />

joint contract-holders are discussed below at para 4.84 onwards.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!