15.08.2013 Views

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

Renting Homes: The Final Report - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART 10<br />

SUPPORTED HOUSING<br />

INTRODUCTION 1<br />

10.1 One of the biggest challenges which has faced the <strong>Commission</strong> in this project<br />

has been the creation of a legal framework for the regulation of supported<br />

housing. Supported housing comes in a wide variety of forms and types of<br />

provision, but it is all designed to provide accommodation for some of the most<br />

disadvantaged and socially excluded members of our society. This very fact<br />

creates its own challenges. Managing supported housing, difficult at the best of<br />

times, can on occasion be extremely dangerous, as occupiers – under the<br />

influence of drugs or alcohol – may behave erratically and threateningly.<br />

10.2 Our thinking about the best way to develop this part of the law has changed<br />

dramatically during the consultation process. Initially we suggested that all<br />

projects providing an appropriate level of supported accommodation to vulnerable<br />

groups should be excluded from our proposed statutory scheme and from the<br />

Protection from Eviction Act 1977. 2 We also suggested that the Secretary of<br />

State could have a power to hold a list of such projects.<br />

10.3 Our reason for adopting this “hands-off” approach was that we thought this would<br />

be the best way to provide a legal environment that would facilitate supported<br />

accommodation for all kinds of short-term social projects such as hostels, drug<br />

rehabilitation projects, and foyers. <strong>The</strong> statutory list would have provided a level<br />

of certainty arising from the lack of statutory protection available to such projects,<br />

overcoming current difficulties in identifying the legal status of certain projects.<br />

10.4 Responses to these proposals were very critical. We were told that we had failed<br />

to appreciate the diversity of supported housing schemes, the extent to which<br />

providers were committed to giving occupiers of supported housing the most<br />

extensive security possible and the increasing professionalisation in supported<br />

housing arising from the Government’s Supporting People 3 programme.<br />

THE NEW APPROACH<br />

10.5 On closer investigation, we realised that the philosophy that underpins the<br />

Supporting People programme presented an excellent basis for developing our<br />

own ideas for the reform of the law. <strong>The</strong> legal framework we now recommend<br />

responds by providing user perspectives, clear frameworks and accountability of<br />

providers. In addition it provides for the stepped progression of clients from<br />

housing dependency towards housing independence.<br />

1 Supported housing is discussed in Part 16 of <strong>Renting</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> (2003) <strong>Law</strong> Com No 284.<br />

2 See paras 9.101 to 9.107 of <strong>Renting</strong> <strong>Homes</strong> (1): Status and Security (2002) <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> Consultation Paper No 162.<br />

3<br />

Department of Social Security, Supporting People: A New Policy and Funding Framework<br />

for Support Services (1998).<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!