16.08.2013 Views

intelligence in a constitutional democracy final report to the ... - Mg

intelligence in a constitutional democracy final report to the ... - Mg

intelligence in a constitutional democracy final report to the ... - Mg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. MINISTERIAL CONTROL AND RESPONSIBILITY 77<br />

4.1 Introduction 77<br />

4.2 Constitutional provisions 78<br />

4.3 Powers and functions of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister 79<br />

4.4 The supply of <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ister and <strong>the</strong> President 84<br />

4.5 Authority for task<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> services 93<br />

4.6 Dismissal, suspension and transfer of a Direc<strong>to</strong>r-General 94<br />

4.7 Adequacy of m<strong>in</strong>isterial regulations and directives 96<br />

4.8 M<strong>in</strong>isterial accountability and m<strong>in</strong>isterial abuse of power 99<br />

4.9 Recommendations 102<br />

5. THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE 108<br />

5.1 Introduction 108<br />

5.2 Functions and powers of <strong>the</strong> Inspec<strong>to</strong>r-General 109<br />

5.3 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mandate of <strong>the</strong> Inspec<strong>to</strong>r-General 113<br />

5.4 Increas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> budget of <strong>the</strong> OIGI 116<br />

5.5 Recommendations of <strong>the</strong> Legislative Review Task Team 116<br />

5.6 The Inspec<strong>to</strong>r-General’s role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> crisis of<br />

2005/6 121<br />

5.7 Recommendations 123<br />

6. MANDATE OF NIA 126<br />

6.1 Introduction 126<br />

6.2 The domestic <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> function as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> law 127<br />

6.3 NIA’s policy on its <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> mandate 128<br />

6.4 The problems with an overly broad <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> mandate 132<br />

6.5 The dangers of political <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> 137<br />

6.6 NIA’s counter-<strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> function as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> law 143<br />

6.7 Departmental <strong><strong>in</strong>telligence</strong> 146<br />

6.8 NIA’s recommendations on its mandate 147<br />

6.9 Recommendations 150<br />

7. INTRUSIVE OPERATIONS 155<br />

7.1 Introduction 155<br />

7.2 The <strong>constitutional</strong> necessity for legislation and safeguards 156<br />

7.3 Constitutional Court judgements on <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gements of <strong>the</strong><br />

right <strong>to</strong> privacy 160<br />

7.4 The grounds for permitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>in</strong>trusive measures 164<br />

7.5 Judicial authorisation for <strong>in</strong>trusive methods 174<br />

7.6 M<strong>in</strong>isterial approval of <strong>in</strong>trusive methods 176<br />

7.7 Recommendations 177<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!