16.08.2013 Views

The UMIST-N Near-Wall Treatment Applied to Periodic Channel Flow

The UMIST-N Near-Wall Treatment Applied to Periodic Channel Flow

The UMIST-N Near-Wall Treatment Applied to Periodic Channel Flow

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4. NUMERICAL IMPLEMENTATION 60<br />

4.4.4 <strong>The</strong> Subgrid Approach<br />

<strong>The</strong> subgrid implementation employed in this work begins with the same grid<br />

used for a log-law wall function, discussed above. This is referred <strong>to</strong> as the<br />

‘main grid’. Within the wall-adjacent cell of the main grid, the subgrid code<br />

generates a subgrid mesh, as shown schematically in Figure 4.3. Within<br />

the subgrid mesh, 50 nodes were used, with an expansion fac<strong>to</strong>r of 1.10.<br />

<strong>The</strong> subgrid mesh is similar <strong>to</strong> the low-Reynolds-number mesh shown in<br />

Figure 4.1, but it fills only the near-wall region corresponding <strong>to</strong> the wall-<br />

adjacent cell of the main grid. <strong>The</strong> subgrid mesh differs from the main<br />

grid mesh in the choice of node locations. While the main grid uses cell<br />

vertexes centred between nodes, the subgrid coded in this work uses nodes<br />

centred between vertexes. 7 This affects way in which linear interpolations<br />

are calculated within the code.<br />

main grid<br />

node<br />

subgrid<br />

node<br />

subgrid<br />

region<br />

Figure 4.3: <strong>The</strong> subgrid mesh, adapted from Gant [21]<br />

7 This is due only <strong>to</strong> programmer preference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!