View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A study on the pollination <strong>of</strong> Sparaxis (also Iridaceae) by Goldblatt et al. (2000) shows<br />
that a species <strong>of</strong> Mesomyia Macquart, 1850 (Tabanidae) and the nemestrinid fly<br />
Prosoeca peringueyi Lichtwardt, 1920 both visit flowers with ‘sucrose-dominant’ nectar.<br />
Subsequent work showed that the nectar sugar characteristics in long-proboscid flypollinated<br />
species <strong>of</strong> Iridaceae, Orchidaceae and Lamiaceae are ‘sucrose-rich or -<br />
dominant’ (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). However, surveyed Pelargonium L’Hér. ex<br />
Aiton species (Geraniaceae), with one exception, have ‘hexose-rich or -dominant’<br />
nectar (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). From such divergent nectar properties, Manning &<br />
Goldblatt (1996) concluded that nectar sugar composition is not a significant factor in<br />
the Prosoeca peringueyi (Nemestrinidae) pollination guild. This observation was<br />
confirmed for other long-proboscid species by Goldblatt & Manning (2000) in their<br />
review on long-proboscid fly pollination in southern Africa.<br />
Data from the current study show that samples <strong>of</strong> long-tubed Lamiaceae such as P.<br />
reflexus, P. hilliardiae, P. ambiguus, O. tubiformis and S. tubulosa all had truly sucrosedominant<br />
nectar (54 – 96% sucrose), while long-tubed species such as P. saccatus<br />
(long-tubed form) and T. longiflora had truly hexose-dominant nectar (Table 1).<br />
Plectranthus species that are not long-tubed, but that are visited for nectar by the longproboscid<br />
S. wiedemanni (e.g. P. ecklonii, P. ciliatus, P. zuluensis and P. fruticosus) all<br />
have truly sucrose-dominant nectar, as do O. tubiformis and S. tubulosa, that have<br />
been inferred to be visited by this nemestrinid fly species (Potgieter & Edwards 2001).<br />
The sample from the long-tubed I. hypoestiflora (Acanthaceae), which also belongs to<br />
the S. wiedemanni pollination guild, showed equal amounts <strong>of</strong> sucrose and hexose<br />
(Table 1). While most <strong>of</strong> the species correspond to a sucrose-dominant pattern, there<br />
are exceptions.<br />
The question then, is whether Plectranthus species that are visited by different types <strong>of</strong><br />
pollinator have different nectar classes as a result. Most Plectranthus species recorded<br />
in Table 1 have sucrose-dominant nectar, with P. saccatus and some samples <strong>of</strong> P.<br />
oertendahlii being the exceptions with hexose-dominant nectar. Plectranthus<br />
oertendahlii is pollinated by medium-proboscid acrocerid flies (see Appendix), but then,<br />
so is P. ciliatus and P. zuluensis T.Cooke, which have sucrose-dominant nectar.<br />
Plectranthus saccatus happens to be the one variable species for which limited<br />
pollinator data was evident during this study: the long-tubed form <strong>of</strong> P. saccatus is<br />
long-proboscid fly-pollinated and, from garden-based observation, at least one<br />
medium-tubed form is pollinated by S. wiedemanni (see Appendix). A further exception<br />
Chapter 7/ 93