18.08.2013 Views

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nectar volume and concentration data is sparsely recorded for other members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lamiaceae. One record is given in Goldblatt & Manning (2000) for the long-tubed<br />

O. tubiformis which had nectar volumes <strong>of</strong> 2.7 – 4.1 μl and concentration <strong>of</strong> 24.5% (SD<br />

2.2). Nectar volumes in three bird-pollinated species <strong>of</strong> Leonotis (Pers.) R.Br. were<br />

measured by Vos et al. (1994), and ranged from 5.3 – 11.3 μl per flower with<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> 19 – 28%. These volumes reflect the nectar-feeding capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

sunbirds, but the nectar concentration falls within the range <strong>of</strong> insect-pollinated<br />

species. Nine species <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae were studied by Dafni et al. (1988) and nectar<br />

volume per flower was found to be small, ranging from 0.14 – 6.3 μl, with most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species having less than 1 μl per flower. Nectar sugar concentration was generally<br />

high, from 25 – 52%, and no correlation was found between honeybee preference for<br />

different plants and nectar volumes or sugar concentrations (Dafni et al. 1998). A<br />

subsequent study, measuring floral parameters in thirteen species <strong>of</strong> Labiatae in Israel<br />

(Dafni 1991), presents nectar concentration values <strong>of</strong> 17 – 60% sucrose equivalents,<br />

with nectar volumes <strong>of</strong> 0.4 – 18.2μl per flower over 24 hours. Larger flowers were found<br />

to <strong>of</strong>fer more calorific reward per flower, and large flowers lasted longer. Nectar<br />

rewards in large flowers, with longer floral tubes, were also better protected from shorttongued<br />

insects and general climatic conditions (Dafni 1991). The study by Ford &<br />

Johnson (2008) showed four species <strong>of</strong> Syncolostemon (Lamiaceae) with tube lengths<br />

varying from 9.6 – 28.0 mm to have corresponding nectar volumes <strong>of</strong> 0.7 – 3.2 μl and<br />

variable nectar concentrations <strong>of</strong> 21.6 – 29.3 %.<br />

In the current study there does not appear to be a relationship between corolla tube<br />

length and maximum volume <strong>of</strong> nectar (Table 4), since short-tubed species such as P.<br />

hadiensis (Forssk.) Schweinf. ex Spreng. and P. ciliatus had nectar volumes similar to<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the long-tubed P. ambiguus and P. hilliardiae. This is contrary to results in<br />

Syncolostemon, where Ford & Johnson (2008) found a positive correlation between<br />

nectar volume and corolla tube length. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> saccate corolla bases in<br />

Plectranthus shows no obvious relationship to nectar volume either (Table 4).<br />

There is, however, a general trend for lower concentrations <strong>of</strong> nectar to be found in<br />

longer-tubed flowers <strong>of</strong> Plectranthus that are pollinated by S. wiedemanni, but no other<br />

trend is evident with respect to pollinator class (Tables 5 & 6). The nectar concentration<br />

values for Plectranthus species pollinated by S. wiedemanni vary from 4 – 55%, which<br />

extends the 20 – 32 % range suggested by Goldblatt & Manning (2000) for longproboscid<br />

flies. The limited nectar concentration data presented in Potgieter et al.<br />

Chapter 7/ 96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!