25.08.2013 Views

Structural reforms and macro-economic policy - ETUC

Structural reforms and macro-economic policy - ETUC

Structural reforms and macro-economic policy - ETUC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Structural</strong> <strong>reforms</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>macro</strong>-<strong>economic</strong> <strong>policy</strong><br />

/ 16<br />

2. What happened on the labour markets<br />

of CEE countries over the last years?<br />

Positive trends, persisting problems<br />

During the period of 2000 – 2004, all CEE countries<br />

finally embarked on solid <strong>economic</strong> growth (see<br />

table 1); however, until 2004 only the Czech Republic,<br />

Hungary, Pol<strong>and</strong>, Slovakia <strong>and</strong> Slovenia, the five most<br />

advanced economies, managed to exceed their 1989<br />

GDP level, albeit in the new structure of GDP.While the<br />

other countries had not yet reached their pre-transition<br />

levels, they recorded in general higher growth<br />

rates in the period under investigation, strengthening<br />

their catching up process. In 2005, increasing exports<br />

contributed to accelerating GDP growth for the eight<br />

new EU members (EU8) indicating positive impact of<br />

accession on these economies.<br />

However, <strong>economic</strong> recovery did not translate into<br />

significant labour market improvement in the<br />

region. Indeed, in the Czech Republic, Lithuania,<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Romania, employment even declined<br />

during the period 2000-2004, while the other countries<br />

achieved a positive, although very modest, net<br />

employment growth (see table 1). Participation rates<br />

did not perform too well either: only four countries -<br />

Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia <strong>and</strong> Slovenia – recorded<br />

increasing participation rates between 2000 <strong>and</strong><br />

2004. Moreover, while in 2000 still four of these<br />

countries exceeded the average participation rate of<br />

the EU15, four years later none of them did <strong>and</strong> even<br />

the two countries with the highest activity rates -<br />

Czech Republic <strong>and</strong> Estonia - remained 0.6<br />

percentage points below the EU15 average 2 (Graph 1).<br />

As for the employment rates, comparisons with the<br />

EU15 average reveal that in 2004 only Slovenia had<br />

its rate slightly above the EU15 average while all<br />

other countries had lower employment rates,<br />

including the Czech Republic <strong>and</strong> Romania, which<br />

four years before had been above or close to the EU15<br />

average. Thus <strong>economic</strong> growth can still be characterized<br />

as nearly jobless for the region, despite huge<br />

employment losses in particular during the transition<br />

crisis in the early 1990s.<br />

In comparison with employment <strong>and</strong> labour force<br />

participation rates, unemployment rates evolved<br />

generally more favourably in the region: they<br />

declined in the majority of the CEE countries, in<br />

particular Bulgaria <strong>and</strong> the Baltic States (see<br />

Table 2). However, a drop in unemployment may<br />

Table 1 GDP <strong>and</strong> employment average annual growth<br />

rates in per cent, 2000-2004<br />

Country GDP Employment<br />

Bulgaria 4.9 +1.11<br />

Croatia 4.1 +0.67<br />

Czech Republic 3.1 -0.24<br />

Estonia 7.2 +0.58<br />

Hungary 3.9 +0.46<br />

Latvia 7.5 +1.01<br />

Lithuania 6.7 -0.28<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 3.1 -1.14<br />

Romania 5.3 -1.66<br />

Slovakia 4.1 +0.35<br />

Slovenia 3.4 +0.63<br />

Source: UNECE database, authors’ calculations.<br />

reflect different type of dynamics across the subregion:<br />

in Lithuania for example, the steep decline<br />

in unemployment can be explained by the combination<br />

of continuous withdrawals from the labour<br />

market <strong>and</strong> rising employment on the one h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a rather large emigration of people after the<br />

country’s accession to the EU in May 2004 on the<br />

other. Most of the labour migrants have been<br />

young people seeking better employment opportunities<br />

mainly in the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> as<br />

could be deduced from sharply declining youth<br />

unemployment presented below 3 . In the other<br />

Baltic States, Slovenia <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria, decreasing<br />

unemployment rates are mainly linked with<br />

growing employment rates. In the Czech Republic,<br />

Hungary <strong>and</strong> Slovakia unemployment decreased<br />

only slightly. In contrast, the situation deteriorated<br />

in Romania <strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>. However, in the first<br />

country, the sharp fall in employment was fully<br />

translated into the declining participation rate<br />

limiting an increase in unemployment. Changes in<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> have been more dramatic <strong>and</strong> worrying as<br />

this particularly high unemployment rate is<br />

combined with low <strong>economic</strong> activity as already<br />

pointed. Labour market developments in this<br />

country contrasted with other CEE countries, with<br />

the exception of Romania.<br />

Despite some converging trends in total unemployment<br />

during the 2000-2004 period (significant<br />

decline in the new EU members together with a<br />

slight increase in the EU15), unemployment rates<br />

have remained still high <strong>and</strong> well above the EU15<br />

average. As noted earlier, differences among countries<br />

2 The difference being more profound for male than for female workers (see forthcoming Cazes, Nesporova 2006)<br />

3 This also seems to be the case of Slovakia <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria , despite so far the c<strong>and</strong>idate status of the latter,as some anecdotal evidence confirms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!