EMN 2008-2009 Overview - Réseau Européen de la Microfinance
EMN 2008-2009 Overview - Réseau Européen de la Microfinance
EMN 2008-2009 Overview - Réseau Européen de la Microfinance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
uK<br />
Switzer<strong>la</strong>nd<br />
Swe<strong>de</strong>n<br />
Spain<br />
Romania<br />
Portugal<br />
Po<strong>la</strong>nd<br />
Norway<br />
Nether<strong>la</strong>nds<br />
Lithuania<br />
Latvia<br />
Italy<br />
Ire<strong>la</strong>nd<br />
Hungary<br />
Germany<br />
France<br />
Fin<strong>la</strong>nd<br />
estonia<br />
Croatia<br />
Bulgaria<br />
Belgium<br />
The graph below shows the various<br />
types of institutions per country. In Estonia,<br />
Hungary, Ire<strong>la</strong>nd, Latvia, Norway, Spain<br />
and Switzer<strong>la</strong>nd, fifty percent or more of the<br />
responding institutions are NGOs. In France,<br />
the sector is divi<strong>de</strong>d equally between banks,<br />
NGOs, non-bank financial institutions and<br />
saving banks. In Spain, the second highest<br />
number of microcredit provi<strong>de</strong>rs is represented<br />
by savings banks, which cover risk with<br />
their “social work” funds. These funds are<br />
managed mainly through foundations created<br />
by the savings banks where the microcredit<br />
programmes are located.<br />
Graph 10: Number of microlen<strong>de</strong>rs by institutional type per country<br />
0 5<br />
10 15 20 25 30 35<br />
Bank Credit union Government NGo NBFI Savings Bank CDFI other<br />
Microlending as a proportion<br />
of activity portfolio<br />
In addition to c<strong>la</strong>ssifying len<strong>de</strong>rs by<br />
mission statement, data shows that len<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
can be broken down into two further<br />
groups: those which have microlending<br />
as their primary occupation and those for<br />
which microlending constitutes a re<strong>la</strong>tively<br />
small proportion of their activity portfolio.<br />
All 170 institutions respon<strong>de</strong>d to this<br />
question. Twenty-four percent of respon<strong>de</strong>nts<br />
are involved only in microlending, compared<br />
to 28% in 2006/07 and 16% in 2004/05<br />
(<strong>EMN</strong>, <strong>2008</strong>). It can be noted, however, that<br />
during the <strong>la</strong>st six years, the proportion of<br />
microfinance institutions that are <strong>de</strong>dicated<br />
exclusively to microfinance in Europe<br />
has fluctuated very little and remains a<br />
re<strong>la</strong>tively small percentage. The remaining<br />
76% of respon<strong>de</strong>nts are <strong>de</strong>dicated to other<br />
complementary activities. For example, 17%<br />
of institutional respon<strong>de</strong>nts are traditional<br />
banks, whereas the rest of the institutions<br />
are focused on other activities such as:<br />
business <strong>de</strong>velopment services (BDS) (35%),<br />
entrepreneurship training (25%), business<br />
incubator (15%) and financial education<br />
programmes (13%). In the United Kingdom,<br />
many institutions lend over 25,000 euros,<br />
and this lending activity makes up a <strong>la</strong>rge<br />
percentage of their overall portfolio.<br />
Looking at the re<strong>la</strong>tive weight of<br />
microlending in this diverse activity<br />
portfolio, we can see that for almost half<br />
(49%) of survey respon<strong>de</strong>nts in the EU,<br />
microlending represents 25% or less of their<br />
activity portfolio. This group is ma<strong>de</strong> up<br />
25