29.08.2013 Views

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FUNCTIONALISM</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>ITS</strong> <strong>CRITICS</strong><br />

of evaluating political systems. His aim was to develop measures<br />

which would enable us to specify the consequences of policies and<br />

hence to make more intelligent choices:<br />

The capacity for greater precision . . . enables us to make our<br />

comparative analysis more relevant to debates over the ethics and<br />

benefits of different types of political systems. 5R<br />

When we introduce the capabilities level of analysis, we enhance<br />

not only our capacity for scientific prediction and explanation, but<br />

also our capacity to talk about policies as they may affect political<br />

change in desired directions. 59<br />

Almond ' s first concern at this point was with measures of sys -<br />

tem effectiveness. Such measures, he felt, could give us some notion<br />

of the capacity of the system to survive and grow. A measure of<br />

system capacities is certainly a necessary preliminary to evaluating<br />

any political system in social justice terms, if we assume that ought<br />

usually implies can. For example, one ' s ethical evaluation of a<br />

society which exposed weak or deformed children would certainly<br />

depend very much upon one ' s estimate of its food resources and<br />

level of technology.<br />

Almond concentrates on three system capacities: the extractive,<br />

regulative, and symbolic. 40 Extractive capacity has to do with the<br />

range of system performance in drawing material and human resources<br />

from the domestic and international environment. 61 Regulative<br />

capacity has to do with the system's capacity to exere&se control<br />

over individuals and groups. Symbolic capacity is not defined with<br />

complete clarity, but seems to be a measure of the system ' s ability<br />

to secure the support of its members through the "judicious creation<br />

and exploitation of the set of powerful and popular symbols." 6 2<br />

Two measures of system capacity discussed by Almond are more<br />

closely related to issues of social justice, those of " distributive "<br />

and "responsive " capacity. The first has to do with the "activity<br />

of the political system as a distributor of benefits among individuals<br />

or groups. Capacity here is measured by<br />

5 8 Comparative Politics, p, 192.<br />

69 Ibid., p. 194.<br />

"Ibid., pp. 190-212.<br />

sl lbid., p. 195.<br />

"Ibid., p. 200.<br />

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!