29.08.2013 Views

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FUNCTIONALISM</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>ITS</strong> <strong>CRITICS</strong> 263<br />

Conceivably it might lead him to argue that it is impossible to develop<br />

a general science of politics.<br />

V. <strong>FUNCTIONALISM</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>ITS</strong> <strong>CRITICS</strong><br />

The functional approach to the study of society has been around<br />

for some time, and the literature on it has grown to fairly enormous<br />

proportions. Most of the arguments as to its utility have been fairly<br />

well rehearsed and need not be repeated here. It should be noted<br />

that many of the technical objections raised against the functionalism<br />

of Radcliff-Brown, Malinowski or even Parsons are not really applicable<br />

to Almond, although some critics behave as if they were.<br />

Hempel, for example, quite correctly pointed out that " explaining"<br />

the emergence or persistence of an institution by the functions<br />

it performs in the larger society is not an explanation at all, for it<br />

assumes that the same function cannot be fulfilled by some other<br />

institutions, or indeed has to be fulfilled at all. 70 Hempel and others<br />

have also noted that many functional analyses implicitly assume<br />

some ideal model of a functioning society, and have suggested that<br />

this is a dubious procedure. One can easily identify a well functioning<br />

car, or, perhaps, a healthy organism, but given the difficulty of<br />

setting overall goals for a society, what appears to be functional<br />

from one perspective might well be disastrous from another.<br />

At least some functionalists have seemed to feel that every institution<br />

must have some relevance to the functioning of a given<br />

social system, and have attempted to explain institutions in ways<br />

which seemed to justify them. Critics have rightly pointed out that<br />

such analyses assume what has to be proven. They also point out<br />

that such analyses often take the overall values and structure of a<br />

society as given. It may be legitimate to demonstrate that Europeans<br />

have too lightly dismissed institutions which played an important<br />

integrative role in various " primitive " societies as archaic and irrational.<br />

It is another matter to inhibit reform in one ' s own society<br />

by making a similar suggestion.<br />

Other critics have suggested that since all societies consist of<br />

individuals and groups competing for relatively scarce resources,<br />

social arrangements which are functional for dominant sectors,<br />

may, in fact, injure other sectors of the population. It is, perhaps,<br />

70 See Hempel, op. cit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!