29.08.2013 Views

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

260 THE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEWER<br />

... the quantity and importance of the objects distributed, the areas<br />

of human life they touch, the particular sections of the population<br />

receiving various benefits, and the relationship between individual<br />

needs and governmental distribution to meet those needs."<br />

To determine the responsive capacity of a regime one must know<br />

what groups are making demands, how these are processed and<br />

what kinds of reactions occur to such demands. 64<br />

In a later essay Almond expanded his attempts at evaluation<br />

somewhat further, and added a system of ethical scores primarily<br />

for purposes of "loosening up the imagination. "61 A justice score<br />

would<br />

consist of a set of per capita rates of regulatory acts over a period<br />

of time, emanating from a particular political system, weighted for<br />

the salience of the areas regulated and the severity of the regulation,<br />

and corrected for opportunities available to the subjects of regulation<br />

to participate in the determination of the content, scope and<br />

intensity of the regulatory rules, and for the procedural protections<br />

in their enforcement. G °<br />

He added suggestions for a liberty score and offered the possibility<br />

of adaptability and other scores.<br />

It is probably unfair to evaluate these efforts at setting up<br />

empirical measures for evaluating polities, given the tentativeness<br />

with which they have been offered. Thus far, however, attempts<br />

to translate them into meaningful research strategies would not<br />

seem too likely to meet with success. One can perhaps develop some<br />

measures of regulatory and extractive capacity, but categories like<br />

responsiveness raise all sorts of issues as to what constitute decisions<br />

and non-decisions, which seem to raise problems of considerable dif -<br />

ficulty, to put it mildly. 87<br />

The ethical scoring system seems even more dubious. Frankly,<br />

I find it hard even to conceive how a justice score might be opera-<br />

63 Ibid., p. 198.<br />

"Ibid., p. 203.<br />

65" Political Development ...," op. cit., p. 467.<br />

86 Ibid.<br />

G7 See Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz, " Decisions and Non-Decisions:<br />

An Analytic Framework, " American Political Science Review 57 ( December,<br />

1963), pp. 632-642, and a critique of their argument by Richard M. Merelman,<br />

" On the Neo-Elitist Critique of Community Power, " American Political<br />

Science Review 62 (June, 1968), pp. 451-460.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!