FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute
FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute
FUNCTIONALISM AND ITS CRITICS - Intercollegiate Studies Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
260 THE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEWER<br />
... the quantity and importance of the objects distributed, the areas<br />
of human life they touch, the particular sections of the population<br />
receiving various benefits, and the relationship between individual<br />
needs and governmental distribution to meet those needs."<br />
To determine the responsive capacity of a regime one must know<br />
what groups are making demands, how these are processed and<br />
what kinds of reactions occur to such demands. 64<br />
In a later essay Almond expanded his attempts at evaluation<br />
somewhat further, and added a system of ethical scores primarily<br />
for purposes of "loosening up the imagination. "61 A justice score<br />
would<br />
consist of a set of per capita rates of regulatory acts over a period<br />
of time, emanating from a particular political system, weighted for<br />
the salience of the areas regulated and the severity of the regulation,<br />
and corrected for opportunities available to the subjects of regulation<br />
to participate in the determination of the content, scope and<br />
intensity of the regulatory rules, and for the procedural protections<br />
in their enforcement. G °<br />
He added suggestions for a liberty score and offered the possibility<br />
of adaptability and other scores.<br />
It is probably unfair to evaluate these efforts at setting up<br />
empirical measures for evaluating polities, given the tentativeness<br />
with which they have been offered. Thus far, however, attempts<br />
to translate them into meaningful research strategies would not<br />
seem too likely to meet with success. One can perhaps develop some<br />
measures of regulatory and extractive capacity, but categories like<br />
responsiveness raise all sorts of issues as to what constitute decisions<br />
and non-decisions, which seem to raise problems of considerable dif -<br />
ficulty, to put it mildly. 87<br />
The ethical scoring system seems even more dubious. Frankly,<br />
I find it hard even to conceive how a justice score might be opera-<br />
63 Ibid., p. 198.<br />
"Ibid., p. 203.<br />
65" Political Development ...," op. cit., p. 467.<br />
86 Ibid.<br />
G7 See Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz, " Decisions and Non-Decisions:<br />
An Analytic Framework, " American Political Science Review 57 ( December,<br />
1963), pp. 632-642, and a critique of their argument by Richard M. Merelman,<br />
" On the Neo-Elitist Critique of Community Power, " American Political<br />
Science Review 62 (June, 1968), pp. 451-460.