Contents - Constitutional Court of Georgia
Contents - Constitutional Court of Georgia
Contents - Constitutional Court of Georgia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Blank-Prose Crime <strong>of</strong> Aggression<br />
Second, the term “aggression” is used twice in the Charter, in Article 39 and in paragraph l <strong>of</strong><br />
Article l, which lists as one <strong>of</strong> the Charter’s purposes “the suppression <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> aggression or other<br />
breaches <strong>of</strong> the peace.” 38 Nowhere in the Charter, however, is “aggression” defined (the result <strong>of</strong><br />
the successful opposition <strong>of</strong> the United States and the United Kingdom to defining the term during<br />
the relevant proceedings at Dumbarton Oaks and San Francisco). 39<br />
C. The General Assembly, International Law Commission, and Rome Conference<br />
Faced with the Charter’s definitional void, the U.N. General Assembly in l946 unanimously reaffirmed<br />
40 the circular definition <strong>of</strong> aggression in the Nuremberg Charter. 41 In the same measure, the<br />
Assembly asked the International Law Commission (ILC) to develop a Code <strong>of</strong> Offenses Against the<br />
Peace and Security <strong>of</strong> Mankind, but difficulties in defining aggression led the ILC to suspend that<br />
effort in l954. 42<br />
Following three unsuccessful efforts <strong>of</strong> its own to define the crime <strong>of</strong> aggression, 43 in l974, the<br />
General Assembly finally defined aggression in Resolution 33l4, which was approved without a<br />
vote. 44 While Resolution 33l4 gave only illustrative examples <strong>of</strong> what constituted aggression, 45 it<br />
defined aggression as a violation <strong>of</strong> the use-<strong>of</strong>-force rules <strong>of</strong> Article 2(4) and Article 5l <strong>of</strong> the U.N.<br />
Charter, 46 leaving matters for all intents and purposes where they were beforehand. 47 The Resolu-<br />
38 U.N. Charter art. l, para. l. The two provisions seem contradictory. Article l, paragraph l indicates that every act <strong>of</strong> aggression is a breach<br />
<strong>of</strong> the peace, whereas Article 39 lists acts <strong>of</strong> aggression and breaches <strong>of</strong> the peace as different <strong>of</strong>fenses. Id.; id. art. 39.<br />
39 The two delegations argued that no definition <strong>of</strong> aggression was necessary given that the concept <strong>of</strong> “breach <strong>of</strong> the peace” included<br />
“aggression.” The Chinese and Russian delegates acquiesced. See OSCAR SOLERA, DEFINING THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION 63 (2007).<br />
40 G.A. Res. 95 (I), 3, U.N. Doc. A/236 (Dec. ll, l946).<br />
41 Charter <strong>of</strong> the International Military Tribunal art. 6, Aug. 8, l945, 59 Stat. l546, 82 U.N.T.S. 284.<br />
42 G.A. Res. 897 (IX), at 50, U.N. Doc. A/2890 (Dec. 4, l954).<br />
43 See Weisbord, supra note l7, at l66.<br />
44 G.A. Res. 33l4 (XXIX), Annex, U.N. Doc. A/RES/33l4 (Dec. l4, l974) [hereinafter Resolution 33l4].<br />
45 Article 3 <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong> aggression approved in Resolution 33l4 provides as follows: Any <strong>of</strong> the following acts, regardless <strong>of</strong> a declaration<br />
<strong>of</strong> war, shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> article 2, qualify as an act <strong>of</strong> aggression:<br />
(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces <strong>of</strong> a State <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> another State, or any military occupation, however temporary,<br />
resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use <strong>of</strong> force <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> another State or part there<strong>of</strong>;<br />
(b) Bombardment by the armed forces <strong>of</strong> a State against the territory <strong>of</strong> another State or the use <strong>of</strong> any weapons by a State against<br />
the territory <strong>of</strong> another State;<br />
(c) The blockade <strong>of</strong> the ports or coasts <strong>of</strong> a State by the armed forces <strong>of</strong> another State; (d) An attack by the armed forces <strong>of</strong> a State on<br />
the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets <strong>of</strong> another State;<br />
(e) The use <strong>of</strong> armed forces <strong>of</strong> one State which are within the territory <strong>of</strong> another State with the agreement <strong>of</strong> the receiving State,<br />
in contravention <strong>of</strong> the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension <strong>of</strong> their presence in such territory beyond the<br />
termination <strong>of</strong> the agreement;<br />
(f) The action <strong>of</strong> a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal <strong>of</strong> another State, to be used by that other State for<br />
perpetrating an act <strong>of</strong> aggression against a third State;<br />
(g) The sending by or on behalf <strong>of</strong> a State <strong>of</strong> armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts <strong>of</strong> armed force<br />
against another State <strong>of</strong> such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein. Id. Annex art. 3.<br />
46 U.N. Charter arts. 2, para. 4, 5l. Article l <strong>of</strong> the definition in Resolution 33l4 provides that “[a]ggression is the use <strong>of</strong> armed force by a<br />
State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence <strong>of</strong> another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the<br />
Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.” Resolution 33l4, supra note 43, Annex art. l.<br />
47 Article 6 provides: “Nothing in this Definition shall be construed as in any way enlarging or diminishing the scope <strong>of</strong> the Charter, including<br />
its provisions concerning cases in which the use <strong>of</strong> force is lawful.” Resolution 33l4, supra note 43, Annex art. 6.<br />
155