Contents - Constitutional Court of Georgia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

44 Françoise Tulkens are such mechanisms for verifying, whenever necessary, the compatibility of existing laws and administrative practice, including as expressed in regulations, orders and circulars; the adaptation, as quickly as possible, of laws and administrative practice in order to prevent violations of the Convention. The perennial problem with reform of the Convention is that it has always suffered from a time lag. This is mainly due to the complexity involved in the drafting of new Protocols that must be ratified by all the Contracting Parties when procedural or structural changes are involved. Protocol No. 11, for example, took more than three years to be ratified by all Contracting Parties. The problem of time lag for a beleaguered international court is that by the time the much-needed reform enters into force the parameters and dimensions of the problem will have changed.
Charlotte Skeet “CONSTITUTIONALISM AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENT IN THE UK” INTRODUCTION Charlotte Skeet Lecturer at the University of Sussex Law School, Doctor of laws. This paper sets out to explore the doctrine of judicial precedent in the UK in the context of a developing constitutionalism. By this latter term I mean a move from the constitution being seen in purely descriptive terms as ‘what happens’ in the UK to a situation where legal as well as political forces both limit and direct state power according to constitutional principles which accord with international norms. I will begin by setting out the current constitutional context within which precedent operates, will move on to explore the scope of the doctrine and finally I will assess the operational impact of the doctrine in relation to United Kingdom cases on the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, before concluding. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF THE HIGHER COURTS IN THE UK There are no separate constitutional courts in the UK. Constitutional issues may come to be adjudicated at any level but important issues are likely to work their way up through the appeal process to reach the highest court. 45
Page 1 and 2: Contents Françoise Tulkens THE EUR
Page 3 and 4: Françoise Tulkens THE EUROPEAN COU
Page 5 and 6: The European Courtof Human Rights i
Page 43: The European Courtof Human Rights i
Page 47 and 48: “Constitutionalism and Judicial P
Page 55 and 56: Lucas Prakke SWAMPING THE LORDS, PA
Page 57 and 58: Swamping the Lords, Packing the Cou
Page 83 and 84: Avtandil Demetrashvili PARADIGMS 1
Page 85 and 86: Paradigms of Constitutionalism in G
Page 95 and 96:
Paradigms of Constitutionalism in G
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
András Sajó CONSTITUTIONALISM AND
Page 111 and 112:
Constitutionalism and Secularism: t
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Guarantees for Local Self-Governmen
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Kononov v. Latvia four people (thre
Page 195 and 196:
Kononov v. Latvia DECISION OF THE C
Page 197 and 198:
Kononov v. Latvia The Court found t
show all

Contents - Constitutional Court of Georgia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?