- Page 1: A thesis submitted in partial fulfi
- Page 5 and 6: 3.1 Stage of Change model 3.2 An in
- Page 7 and 8: INDEX OF TABLES Table 2.1. Employme
- Page 9 and 10: less time on health and safety acti
- Page 11 and 12: “It shall be the duty of every em
- Page 13 and 14: greatest majority of commercial ent
- Page 15 and 16: een utilised to investigate and imp
- Page 17 and 18: usinesses that employ less than two
- Page 19 and 20: acknowledge the importance of healt
- Page 21 and 22: shift has been the result for many
- Page 23 and 24: to accidents; outcome expectancies
- Page 25 and 26: offered by external agencies. Restr
- Page 27 and 28: The notion that interventions may n
- Page 29 and 30: inconvenience, time and trouble whi
- Page 31 and 32: perceived “rip off” culture has
- Page 33 and 34: are still unwilling to compromise t
- Page 35 and 36: stress. Furthermore, one problem wi
- Page 37 and 38: The Management Standards are in the
- Page 39 and 40: 2.2.9 Basic Steps Towards Complianc
- Page 41 and 42: authorised or facilitated by the re
- Page 43 and 44: The employment of union health and
- Page 45 and 46: costs depends on improvement of per
- Page 47 and 48: Hairdressers Federation than inform
- Page 49 and 50: about consequences (of not having c
- Page 51 and 52: are: knowledge (increased awareness
- Page 53 and 54:
such as health and safety assessmen
- Page 55 and 56:
assessments and then use the site t
- Page 57 and 58:
of the enterprises’ health and sa
- Page 59 and 60:
standards, for example sanctions su
- Page 61 and 62:
(Stephens, Hickling, Gaskell, Burto
- Page 63 and 64:
in the particular context, is a tai
- Page 65 and 66:
Lack of skills and knowledge appear
- Page 67 and 68:
3 CHAPTER THREE : LITERATURE REVIEW
- Page 69 and 70:
Barrett et al (2005) propose that t
- Page 71 and 72:
model does not explain how individu
- Page 73 and 74:
consensus on a theoretical framewor
- Page 75 and 76:
2005). Thompson (1986) defined cont
- Page 77 and 78:
according to level of motivation in
- Page 79 and 80:
Maclean, Sinfield, Klein, & Harnden
- Page 81 and 82:
may not be a valid reason for choos
- Page 83 and 84:
guidance. However other factors nee
- Page 85 and 86:
with the practical opportunities pr
- Page 87 and 88:
together with domains identified by
- Page 89 and 90:
The interview protocol comprised th
- Page 91 and 92:
A ‘cold calling’ approach to te
- Page 93 and 94:
SMEs. To facilitate this, behaviour
- Page 95 and 96:
Information on the cover sheet of t
- Page 97 and 98:
disagree’, ‘disagree’, ‘neu
- Page 99 and 100:
Training records in health & safety
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5.2 Number of staff and repo
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5.4 Relative health & safety
- Page 105 and 106:
5.1.5 Motives for Engagement with H
- Page 107 and 108:
Themes were identified from the the
- Page 109 and 110:
SMEs highlighted the existence of a
- Page 111 and 112:
“So we have an operational aspect
- Page 113 and 114:
to be enabled by communication with
- Page 115 and 116:
“In our experience especially in
- Page 117 and 118:
“Technology used to be the barrie
- Page 119 and 120:
The telephone interview findings di
- Page 121 and 122:
complying with legislation were als
- Page 123 and 124:
114
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6.1 Hours per week organisat
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 6.3. Size by Stage of Change
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 6.3 Decision making and encou
- Page 131 and 132:
Eigenvalue 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 3 5 Fi
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 6.4 Oblimin factor solution w
- Page 135 and 136:
The nature of the attitude variable
- Page 137 and 138:
the project, the figure was 60%. Th
- Page 139 and 140:
framework to meaningfully consider
- Page 141 and 142:
encouragement of health & safety be
- Page 143 and 144:
The third factor comprised items re
- Page 145 and 146:
In the regression model which consi
- Page 147 and 148:
about capability (self-efficacy), a
- Page 149 and 150:
safety information, training and go
- Page 151 and 152:
feelings of control needed to promo
- Page 153 and 154:
7 CHAPTER SEVEN: DISCUSSION In this
- Page 155 and 156:
capabilities. The evidence for know
- Page 157 and 158:
study. It could be argued that this
- Page 159 and 160:
2002), although it has shown some v
- Page 161 and 162:
the events. Further, careful select
- Page 163 and 164:
were limited by the survey tools, w
- Page 165 and 166:
IMPLICATIONS FOR GOOD PRACTICE AND
- Page 167 and 168:
stronger links with their suppliers
- Page 169 and 170:
160
- Page 171 and 172:
of health and safety appraisal with
- Page 173 and 174:
Dugdill, L., Kavanagh, C., Barlow,
- Page 175 and 176:
Haslam, R. A. (2002). Targeting erg
- Page 177 and 178:
Ley, P. & Morris, L.A. (1984) Psych
- Page 179 and 180:
Pilkington, A., Graham, M., Cowie,
- Page 181 and 182:
Tait, R., & Walker, D. (2000b). Mar
- Page 183 and 184:
Winum, P., Ryterband, E., Stephenso
- Page 185:
Appendices 176
- Page 189 and 190:
General Introductions We are undert
- Page 191:
Making 48. a) Are you aware of any
- Page 195 and 196:
Pre-contemplation Buying “No, I'm
- Page 197 and 198:
“Only the general risk assessment
- Page 200:
Appendix C - Questionnaire
- Page 203 and 204:
23 We have to have health and safet
- Page 205 and 206:
54 Carrying out health and safety t