PDF (A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for ...
PDF (A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for ...
PDF (A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.2.6 Social Characteristics and Dynamics<br />
Social <strong>in</strong>fluences such as management commitment may be strong<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> health and safety behaviour. For <strong>in</strong>stance, personal<br />
considerations may deter owner-managers from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> health<br />
promot<strong>in</strong>g activities with staff. Owners, boss or senior managers are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
gatekeepers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resources available <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> SME’s health and safety activity<br />
(Stephens et al., 2004). However, <strong>the</strong>se identified gatekeepers <strong>of</strong>ten block<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiatives through <strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> health and safety. Some companies<br />
have reported a lack <strong>of</strong> support from <strong>the</strong> staff, or a difficulty <strong>in</strong> co-ord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people to discuss health and safety skills. Predictably, lack <strong>of</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
and communication with<strong>in</strong> a company has also been shown to be a constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />
on health and safety activities (Griff<strong>in</strong> et al., 2005). O<strong>the</strong>r social characteristics<br />
and dynamics found <strong>in</strong> small bus<strong>in</strong>esses can be also l<strong>in</strong>ked to differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
outcomes <strong>for</strong> health and safety. For example, favourable relations with<br />
owner/managers may persuade employees to accept riskier work conditions,<br />
ignor<strong>in</strong>g personal needs <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perceived economic <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
enterprise (Eak<strong>in</strong> & MacEachen, 1998). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, poor employment<br />
relations may <strong>in</strong>crease difficulties relat<strong>in</strong>g to health and safety issues. Ill<br />
health and <strong>in</strong>jury can <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e be “shaped by, and itself shapes, social<br />
relations” (Eak<strong>in</strong> & MacEachen, 1998). Managers would, <strong>of</strong> course, wish to<br />
show understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> employees’ difficulties, particularly where <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are close work<strong>in</strong>g relations, and also a desire to preserve <strong>the</strong> autonomy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
employees. The employees may have unique understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir risks but<br />
23