26.09.2013 Views

Stáhnout toto číslo ve formátu PDF - Fakulta podnikatelská - Vysoké ...

Stáhnout toto číslo ve formátu PDF - Fakulta podnikatelská - Vysoké ...

Stáhnout toto číslo ve formátu PDF - Fakulta podnikatelská - Vysoké ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRENDY EKONOMIKY A MANAGEMENTU / TRENDS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT<br />

points (last couple and first couple of days and<br />

in the month) generate higher returns than other<br />

days of the month.<br />

Looking for time-of-the-year anomalies<br />

Brown and Luo (2004) tested monthly<br />

seasonality in stock market returns found that<br />

January has a characteristic to predict a<br />

tendency for the year. Their tests show that “if<br />

an in<strong>ve</strong>stor wishes to in<strong>ve</strong>st in the stock market<br />

for one calendar month only, he or she is better<br />

off being in the stock market during January<br />

than during any other calendar month“. They<br />

also concluded that when stock prices rise (fall)<br />

in a particular calendar month, they rise by<br />

more (fall by less) in January than they do in<br />

any other calendar month so the January effect<br />

works both conditionally and unconditionally.<br />

One of the most interesting<br />

phenomenon found in stock exchange is called<br />

“Sell in May and Go Away” effect. Bouman<br />

and Jacobsen (2002) re<strong>ve</strong>aled that a trading<br />

strategy of tactical asset allocation based on the<br />

old saying “Sell in May and go away”<br />

generated abnormal returns in comparison with<br />

stock market indices in most countries in their<br />

study. They tried to find the explanation for this<br />

anomaly by testing if various popular<br />

hypotheses show any scientifically significant<br />

evidence. They tested if January effect causes<br />

this anomaly or it is only sector-specific<br />

anomaly and also if trading volume and interest<br />

rates during that period showing some<br />

di<strong>ve</strong>rgence with other months of the year.<br />

These tests did not explained this anomaly, but<br />

one thing they did find was that “the size of the<br />

effect is significantly related to both length and<br />

timing of vacations and also to the impact of<br />

vacations on trading activity in different<br />

countries”.<br />

2 Data and metodology<br />

The monthly total returns for analysis<br />

of Lithuanian stock market are taken from<br />

Nasdaq OMXV index. The closing bid-ask<br />

quotes are obtained from the NasdaqOMX<br />

database, which is available from January 2000.<br />

Accordingly, our study co<strong>ve</strong>rs 2000 through<br />

March 2010.<br />

We used the natural logarithm of one<br />

plus these returns in our analysis. A shortened<br />

<strong>ve</strong>rsion of the X-11 procedure (Dagum, 1980)<br />

is applied to the returns data from January 2000<br />

to March 2010 for estimating the seasonal<br />

– 40 –<br />

ROČNÍK IV – ČÍSLO 06 / VOLUME IV – NUMBER 06<br />

components. The basic model used in our study<br />

is the traditional three-component additi<strong>ve</strong><br />

<strong>ve</strong>rsion:<br />

where<br />

ln[l + R(t)] = SF(t) + TC(t) + IR(t) (1)<br />

R(t) = total return during the month t;<br />

SF(t) = the seasonal component of ln[l + R(t)];<br />

TC(t) = the nonseasonal systematic component of<br />

ln[l + R(t)], commonly referred to as the trendcyclical<br />

component;<br />

IR(t) = the irregular component of ln[l + R(t)].<br />

It is assumed that both SF and TC mo<strong>ve</strong><br />

stochastically but gradually through time. Thus,<br />

for example, the seasonal components of<br />

January returns across years could vary due to<br />

changes in their expected values and/or<br />

seasonal noises. The irregular component<br />

represents random variation other than that<br />

generated ty the stochastic mo<strong>ve</strong>ment of SF and<br />

TC. It is assumed that the seasonal and the<br />

trend-cyclical noises are not correlated with the<br />

irregular component either contemporaneously<br />

or temporally.<br />

Return seasonality exists if the expected<br />

values of the seasonal components of at least<br />

two calendar months differ. A positi<strong>ve</strong><br />

(negati<strong>ve</strong>) seasonal component, also known as a<br />

seasonal high (low), indicates positi<strong>ve</strong><br />

(negati<strong>ve</strong>) seasonal pressure or higher (lower)<br />

stock returns than what would ha<strong>ve</strong> been if<br />

there were no special influence of e<strong>ve</strong>nts which<br />

repeatedly occur in that month. In other words,<br />

there is predictable surge in demand for stocks<br />

in some month(s) which, howe<strong>ve</strong>r, is balanced<br />

by slack in demand in some other month(s).<br />

The surge and slack in demand are relati<strong>ve</strong> to<br />

the a<strong>ve</strong>rage situation o<strong>ve</strong>r the year. Hence, a<br />

seasonally neutral month (zero seasonal<br />

component) represents the a<strong>ve</strong>rage situation.<br />

The economic meaning of the X-11<br />

systematic and seasonal components should<br />

thus be clear. The return one can expect during<br />

a calendar month is equal to the sum of<br />

expected TC and expected SF for that month;<br />

we refer to the sum as the systematic<br />

component of return. Since TC is expected to<br />

be the same for all months o<strong>ve</strong>r an extended<br />

period of time, the a<strong>ve</strong>rage seasonal component<br />

of a month would represent the difference<br />

between it's expected (unconditional) return or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!