Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
35<br />
writers, however, which I expect to prove to be only apparent: 9<br />
the sacrifice of a capra to Vediovis (Gell. V, 12, 12) ; of an agna<br />
to Jupiter at the auspicatio vindemiae (Varra L. L. VI. 16) ;10<br />
and of the ovis 1duris to Jupiter. As the proof for my position<br />
on the first two is bound up with that for my position on the<br />
third, which is the real subject of the present dissertation, I shall<br />
proceed at once to a discussion of the ovis 1duris.<br />
Four places have survived in Roman literature that pertain to<br />
the victim of the Ides, namely, those of Ovid, above quoted, and<br />
two prose passages, one in Paulus Diaconus ll and one in Macrobius.<br />
'2 Paulus says:<br />
"Idulis ovis dicebatur quae omnibus Idibus Iovi mactabatur".<br />
The words in Macrobius are:<br />
"Sunt qui aestiment Idus ab ove Iduli dictas, quam hoc nomine<br />
vocant Tusci et omnibus Idibus Iovi immolatur a flamine".<br />
Let it be noted that the relative pronoun modifying ovis in<br />
both instances is feminine. Therefore, these two passages, with<br />
that of Varro just cited on the agna of the auspicatio vindemiae,<br />
taken in connection with grandior agna in Fasti I, 56, would<br />
seem to constitute rather a strong argument in favor of the<br />
offering of female victims to Jupiter, especially of a female sheep<br />
on the Ides.<br />
• Krause, p. 20 sqq., contends that these exceptions are merely apparent,<br />
but his arguments are in the main superficial, and he does not<br />
seem to me to offer convincing proof. He fails to produce any testimony<br />
that the aglla of the auspicatio vindemiae was male, except (p. 15) to draw<br />
the inference from Paulus, p. 6, that agna was of common gender and<br />
to conclude (p. 22) in contradiction of this hypothesis that Varro (L. L.<br />
VI, 16) had made a mistake. As regards the avis Idulis (pp. 11-12), he<br />
makes the assertion that ancient and modern writers wrongly agree that it<br />
was female, and thus leaves out of account Ovid's positive statement that<br />
the victim was a vervex, which Krause quotes but otherwise ignores; he is<br />
chiefly concerned with proving that the animal was the a1·ies rather than<br />
the vervex or castrated male. Altogether there is need of a thorough investigation<br />
to establish the nature of this sacrifice.<br />
10 UN am aliquot locis vindemiae primum ab sacerdotibus publice fiebant,<br />
ut Romae etiam nunc; nam f1amen Dialis auspicatur vindemiam et ut<br />
iussit vinum legere agna Iovi facit, inter cuius exta caesa et proiecta flam en<br />
t porus vinum legit."<br />
11 p. 104.<br />
M I, 15, 16.