08.10.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

writers, however, which I expect to prove to be only apparent: 9<br />

the sacrifice of a capra to Vediovis (Gell. V, 12, 12) ; of an agna<br />

to Jupiter at the auspicatio vindemiae (Varra L. L. VI. 16) ;10<br />

and of the ovis 1duris to Jupiter. As the proof for my position<br />

on the first two is bound up with that for my position on the<br />

third, which is the real subject of the present dissertation, I shall<br />

proceed at once to a discussion of the ovis 1duris.<br />

Four places have survived in Roman literature that pertain to<br />

the victim of the Ides, namely, those of Ovid, above quoted, and<br />

two prose passages, one in Paulus Diaconus ll and one in Macrobius.<br />

'2 Paulus says:<br />

"Idulis ovis dicebatur quae omnibus Idibus Iovi mactabatur".<br />

The words in Macrobius are:<br />

"Sunt qui aestiment Idus ab ove Iduli dictas, quam hoc nomine<br />

vocant Tusci et omnibus Idibus Iovi immolatur a flamine".<br />

Let it be noted that the relative pronoun modifying ovis in<br />

both instances is feminine. Therefore, these two passages, with<br />

that of Varro just cited on the agna of the auspicatio vindemiae,<br />

taken in connection with grandior agna in Fasti I, 56, would<br />

seem to constitute rather a strong argument in favor of the<br />

offering of female victims to Jupiter, especially of a female sheep<br />

on the Ides.<br />

• Krause, p. 20 sqq., contends that these exceptions are merely apparent,<br />

but his arguments are in the main superficial, and he does not<br />

seem to me to offer convincing proof. He fails to produce any testimony<br />

that the aglla of the auspicatio vindemiae was male, except (p. 15) to draw<br />

the inference from Paulus, p. 6, that agna was of common gender and<br />

to conclude (p. 22) in contradiction of this hypothesis that Varro (L. L.<br />

VI, 16) had made a mistake. As regards the avis Idulis (pp. 11-12), he<br />

makes the assertion that ancient and modern writers wrongly agree that it<br />

was female, and thus leaves out of account Ovid's positive statement that<br />

the victim was a vervex, which Krause quotes but otherwise ignores; he is<br />

chiefly concerned with proving that the animal was the a1·ies rather than<br />

the vervex or castrated male. Altogether there is need of a thorough investigation<br />

to establish the nature of this sacrifice.<br />

10 UN am aliquot locis vindemiae primum ab sacerdotibus publice fiebant,<br />

ut Romae etiam nunc; nam f1amen Dialis auspicatur vindemiam et ut<br />

iussit vinum legere agna Iovi facit, inter cuius exta caesa et proiecta flam en<br />

t porus vinum legit."<br />

11 p. 104.<br />

M I, 15, 16.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!