NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...
NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...
NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28 BULLET<strong>IN</strong> AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 264<br />
bricius and treated the use by O. Müller and<br />
Ström as subsequent citations. From Gravenhorst<br />
(1802) until 1895 most authors cited<br />
Fabricius as the author of P. marginatus;<br />
from Ganglbauer (1895: 448) to present,<br />
most authors have cited Ström as author. It<br />
seems likely that the three names represent<br />
the same species, and therefore O. Müller is<br />
the author.<br />
Philonthus obscuratus Cameron, 1951:<br />
402, is a new synonym of Philonthus debiliformis<br />
Cameron, 1951: 402. Philonthus obscuratus<br />
Cameron, 1951 is a junior primary<br />
homonym of Gabrius obscuratus (Cameron,<br />
1950a: 41) (ex Philonthus). Tottenham<br />
(1962: 195) wrote ‘‘. . . I am of the opinion<br />
that it [obscuratus Cameron] is identical with<br />
P. debiliformis Cameron ...’’;hewaswriting<br />
about the 1951 name, but he took no action.<br />
I accept Tottenham’s surmise that P. obscuratus<br />
is a synonym of P. debiliformis.<br />
Philonthus pheres Smetana, 1963: 74 is a<br />
new synonym of Philonthus renominatus<br />
Cameron, 1937: 5. Both names were proposed<br />
to replace the junior primary homonym<br />
Philonthus vicinus Cameron, 1933b:<br />
389.<br />
Philonthus rufimanus Erichson, 1840: 476<br />
is a new synonym of rufimanus Heer, 1839:<br />
266. Redtenbacher (1849: 703; 1857: 193)<br />
and Kraatz (1857: 609) cited the Heer and<br />
Erichson descriptions as referring to the<br />
same species.<br />
Philonthus splendens (Fabricius, 1793:<br />
523) has an older synonym, Philonthus niger<br />
(O. Müller, 1764: 23), that has been a synonym<br />
of Philonthus splendens since 1840<br />
and, until 1996, was not cited as valid after<br />
1899 (article 23.9.1.1). In the last 50 years<br />
at least 36 articles by 31 authors have been<br />
published listing Philonthus splendens Fabricius<br />
as valid (article 23.9.1.2). A list of these<br />
citations is provided in the forthcoming catalog<br />
for the family (Herman, in press). However,<br />
Ádám (1996: 244) resurrected P. niger,<br />
thereby compromising application of article<br />
23.9.1. Use of the older name will create significant<br />
instability. The younger name has<br />
been cited as valid in many publications and<br />
is known by many workers, and thus its use<br />
should be maintained. The matter will be referred<br />
to the Commission; meanwhile, use of<br />
the junior name is to be maintained (article<br />
23.9.3).<br />
Philonthus succicola Thomson, 1860: 157<br />
has an older synonym, Philonthus nigritus<br />
(Runde, 1835: 7), which has been a junior<br />
synonym of Philonthus carbonarius (Gravenhorst,<br />
1802), Philonthus chalceus Stephens,<br />
1832, or Philonthus succicola Thomson<br />
since 1840 and was not cited as valid<br />
after 1899 (article 23.9.1.1). In the last 50<br />
years at least 27 articles by 21 authors have<br />
been published citing Philonthus succicola<br />
Thomson as valid (article 23.9.1.2). A list of<br />
these citations is provided in the forthcoming<br />
catalog for the family (Herman, in press).<br />
Philonthus succicola Thomson is a nomen<br />
protectum and P. nigritus (Runde) a nomen<br />
oblitum (article 23.9.2).<br />
Platydracus immaculatus (Mannerheim,<br />
1830: 22) is resurrected to replace the more<br />
recently named Platydracus vulpinus (Nordmann,<br />
1837: 53). Smetana and Davies (2000:<br />
25) had not examined the relevant types and<br />
had doubts that they were conspecific, but<br />
Newton (personal commun.), who has studied<br />
the types, regards them to be the same.<br />
Polyphematiana E. Strand, 1915: 122 is a<br />
new synonym of Trigonopselaphus Gemminger<br />
and Harold, 1868: 597. Trigonopselaphus<br />
was proposed by Gemminger and<br />
Harold (1868: 597) to replace Trigonophorus<br />
Nordmann, 1837: 8 (not Stephens, 1829, or<br />
Hope, 1831). Nordmann included only Trigonophorus<br />
myrtillinus Nordmann, 1837: 8,<br />
in Trigonophorus, so that is the type species<br />
of the genus by monotypy and is also the<br />
type species of Trigonopselaphus by objective<br />
synonymy with Trigonophorus. Bernhauer<br />
(1921: 19) moved T. myrtillinus to<br />
Polyphemus Bernhauer, 1914: 397 (not<br />
Mueller, 1776), which had already been replaced<br />
by Polyphematiana E. Strand, 1915:<br />
122. Scheerpeltz (1933: 1415; 1972: 35) also<br />
included the species in Polyphematiana, but<br />
still listed Trigonopselaphus as a valid genus,<br />
excluding only T. myrtillinus. Two checklists<br />
(Blackwelder, 1944: 141; Moore and Legner,<br />
1975: 45) continued to list myrtillinus in Trigonopselaphus.<br />
If the transfer of T. myrtillinus<br />
to Polyphematiana is accepted, then Trigonopselaphus<br />
Gemminger and Harold,<br />
1868, must replace Polyphematiana E.<br />
Strand, 1915. All the species remaining in