24.10.2012 Views

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 BULLET<strong>IN</strong> AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 264<br />

bricius and treated the use by O. Müller and<br />

Ström as subsequent citations. From Gravenhorst<br />

(1802) until 1895 most authors cited<br />

Fabricius as the author of P. marginatus;<br />

from Ganglbauer (1895: 448) to present,<br />

most authors have cited Ström as author. It<br />

seems likely that the three names represent<br />

the same species, and therefore O. Müller is<br />

the author.<br />

Philonthus obscuratus Cameron, 1951:<br />

402, is a new synonym of Philonthus debiliformis<br />

Cameron, 1951: 402. Philonthus obscuratus<br />

Cameron, 1951 is a junior primary<br />

homonym of Gabrius obscuratus (Cameron,<br />

1950a: 41) (ex Philonthus). Tottenham<br />

(1962: 195) wrote ‘‘. . . I am of the opinion<br />

that it [obscuratus Cameron] is identical with<br />

P. debiliformis Cameron ...’’;hewaswriting<br />

about the 1951 name, but he took no action.<br />

I accept Tottenham’s surmise that P. obscuratus<br />

is a synonym of P. debiliformis.<br />

Philonthus pheres Smetana, 1963: 74 is a<br />

new synonym of Philonthus renominatus<br />

Cameron, 1937: 5. Both names were proposed<br />

to replace the junior primary homonym<br />

Philonthus vicinus Cameron, 1933b:<br />

389.<br />

Philonthus rufimanus Erichson, 1840: 476<br />

is a new synonym of rufimanus Heer, 1839:<br />

266. Redtenbacher (1849: 703; 1857: 193)<br />

and Kraatz (1857: 609) cited the Heer and<br />

Erichson descriptions as referring to the<br />

same species.<br />

Philonthus splendens (Fabricius, 1793:<br />

523) has an older synonym, Philonthus niger<br />

(O. Müller, 1764: 23), that has been a synonym<br />

of Philonthus splendens since 1840<br />

and, until 1996, was not cited as valid after<br />

1899 (article 23.9.1.1). In the last 50 years<br />

at least 36 articles by 31 authors have been<br />

published listing Philonthus splendens Fabricius<br />

as valid (article 23.9.1.2). A list of these<br />

citations is provided in the forthcoming catalog<br />

for the family (Herman, in press). However,<br />

Ádám (1996: 244) resurrected P. niger,<br />

thereby compromising application of article<br />

23.9.1. Use of the older name will create significant<br />

instability. The younger name has<br />

been cited as valid in many publications and<br />

is known by many workers, and thus its use<br />

should be maintained. The matter will be referred<br />

to the Commission; meanwhile, use of<br />

the junior name is to be maintained (article<br />

23.9.3).<br />

Philonthus succicola Thomson, 1860: 157<br />

has an older synonym, Philonthus nigritus<br />

(Runde, 1835: 7), which has been a junior<br />

synonym of Philonthus carbonarius (Gravenhorst,<br />

1802), Philonthus chalceus Stephens,<br />

1832, or Philonthus succicola Thomson<br />

since 1840 and was not cited as valid<br />

after 1899 (article 23.9.1.1). In the last 50<br />

years at least 27 articles by 21 authors have<br />

been published citing Philonthus succicola<br />

Thomson as valid (article 23.9.1.2). A list of<br />

these citations is provided in the forthcoming<br />

catalog for the family (Herman, in press).<br />

Philonthus succicola Thomson is a nomen<br />

protectum and P. nigritus (Runde) a nomen<br />

oblitum (article 23.9.2).<br />

Platydracus immaculatus (Mannerheim,<br />

1830: 22) is resurrected to replace the more<br />

recently named Platydracus vulpinus (Nordmann,<br />

1837: 53). Smetana and Davies (2000:<br />

25) had not examined the relevant types and<br />

had doubts that they were conspecific, but<br />

Newton (personal commun.), who has studied<br />

the types, regards them to be the same.<br />

Polyphematiana E. Strand, 1915: 122 is a<br />

new synonym of Trigonopselaphus Gemminger<br />

and Harold, 1868: 597. Trigonopselaphus<br />

was proposed by Gemminger and<br />

Harold (1868: 597) to replace Trigonophorus<br />

Nordmann, 1837: 8 (not Stephens, 1829, or<br />

Hope, 1831). Nordmann included only Trigonophorus<br />

myrtillinus Nordmann, 1837: 8,<br />

in Trigonophorus, so that is the type species<br />

of the genus by monotypy and is also the<br />

type species of Trigonopselaphus by objective<br />

synonymy with Trigonophorus. Bernhauer<br />

(1921: 19) moved T. myrtillinus to<br />

Polyphemus Bernhauer, 1914: 397 (not<br />

Mueller, 1776), which had already been replaced<br />

by Polyphematiana E. Strand, 1915:<br />

122. Scheerpeltz (1933: 1415; 1972: 35) also<br />

included the species in Polyphematiana, but<br />

still listed Trigonopselaphus as a valid genus,<br />

excluding only T. myrtillinus. Two checklists<br />

(Blackwelder, 1944: 141; Moore and Legner,<br />

1975: 45) continued to list myrtillinus in Trigonopselaphus.<br />

If the transfer of T. myrtillinus<br />

to Polyphematiana is accepted, then Trigonopselaphus<br />

Gemminger and Harold,<br />

1868, must replace Polyphematiana E.<br />

Strand, 1915. All the species remaining in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!