24.10.2012 Views

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE STAPHYLINIDAE (INSECTA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 BULLET<strong>IN</strong> AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 264<br />

authors have been published listing Quedius<br />

suturalis Kiesenwetter as valid (article<br />

23.9.1.2); 23 articles are listed in a forthcoming<br />

catalog (Herman, in press), and the other<br />

four are cited herein (Dynort, 1995: 41; Köhler,<br />

1997: 68; Wagner, 1992: 141; Wenzel,<br />

1993: 11). Quedius suturalis is a nomen<br />

protectum and Q. suturalis (Stephens) a nomen<br />

oblitum (article 23.9.2).<br />

Quedius unicolor Kiesenwetter, 1847: 75<br />

is a junior primary homonym of Philonthus<br />

unicolor (Stephens, 1832: 224) (ex Quedius).<br />

Philonthus unicolor (Stephens) has been a<br />

synonym of Philonthus varians (Paykull,<br />

1789) since 1858, except once in 1957, when<br />

it was used as the valid name in North America,<br />

thus compromising use of article<br />

23.9.1.1). In the last 50 years at least 25 articles<br />

by 19 authors have been published listing<br />

Quedius unicolor Kiesenwetter as valid;<br />

21 articles are listed in a forthcoming catalog<br />

(Herman, in press), and the other four are<br />

cited herein (Hugentobler, 1966: 83; Peez<br />

and Kahlen, 1977: 165; Schiller, 1989: 1061;<br />

Wörndle, 1950: 156). The two homonyms<br />

were not congeneric after 1899, but since the<br />

senior name is currently cited as a junior synonym,<br />

provisions of article 23.9.5 for continued<br />

use of the junior homonym are not strictly<br />

met. It seems unnecessary to replace the<br />

junior of two names that have not been congeneric<br />

for more than 100 years. The case<br />

will be referred to the Commission; meanwhile,<br />

prevailing use will be maintained (article<br />

23.9.5).<br />

Staphylinus affinis Solsky, 1868: 126 is a<br />

junior primary homonym of Atrecus affinis<br />

(Paykull, 1789: 24) (ex Staphylinus). S. affinis<br />

Solsky will be placed in synonymy (A.<br />

Newton, personal commun.). Both names are<br />

currently used as valid and were not congeneric<br />

after 1899 (Herman, in press). The case<br />

will be referred to the Commission; meanwhile,<br />

use of the junior name is maintained<br />

(article 23.9.5).<br />

Staphylinus auricomus Cameron, 1929: 65<br />

is a junior primary homonym of Glenus auricomus<br />

(Brullé, 1842: pl. 5, fig. 6) (ex Staphylinus).<br />

Glenus auricomus (Brullé) is a<br />

synonym of Glenus chrysis (Gravenhorst,<br />

1806) and was not cited as valid after 1899<br />

(article 23.9.1.1). However, the number of articles<br />

citing Staphylinus auricomus Cameron<br />

as valid in the last 50 years is not sufficient<br />

to protect it under article 23.9.1 (Herman, in<br />

press). The two homonyms were not congeneric<br />

after 1899, but since the senior name is<br />

currently cited as a junior synonym, provisions<br />

of article 23.9.5 for continued use of<br />

the junior homonym are not strictly met. It<br />

seems unnecessary to replace the junior of<br />

two names that have not been congeneric for<br />

more than 100 years. The case will be referred<br />

to the Commission; meanwhile, prevailing<br />

use will be maintained (article<br />

23.9.5).<br />

Staphylinus bicolor Gmelin, 1790: 2027 is<br />

a junior primary homonym of Lesteva bicolor<br />

(Paykull, 1789: 21) (ex Staphylinus). Lesteva<br />

bicolor (Paykull) has been a junior synonym<br />

of Lesteva longoelytrata (Goeze,<br />

1777) since 1895, and the two homonyms<br />

were not congeneric after 1899 (Herman, in<br />

press). Staphylinus bicolor Gmelin has not<br />

been cited since its original description, and<br />

thus it should be considered a nomen dubium<br />

and the required replacement ignored.<br />

Staphylinus chrysis Bernhauer, 1936: 24 is<br />

a junior primary homonym of Glenus chrysis<br />

(Gravenhorst, 1806: 124) (ex Staphylinus).<br />

Both names are currently used as valid and<br />

were not congeneric after 1899 (Herman, in<br />

press). The case will be referred to the Commission;<br />

meanwhile, use of the junior name<br />

is maintained (article 23.9.5).<br />

Staphylinus cursor Grimmer, 1841: 32 is<br />

a junior primary homonym of Omalium cursor<br />

(O. Müller, 1776: 97) (ex Staphylinus).<br />

Omalium cursor (O. Müller) has been a synonym<br />

of Omalium rivulare (Paykull, 1789)<br />

since 1840 and the two homonyms were not<br />

congeneric after 1899 (Herman, in press).<br />

Staphylinus cursor Grimmer has been cited<br />

once, in 1868, since the original description<br />

and, although cited as valid, it should be considered<br />

a nomen dubium and the required<br />

replacement ignored.<br />

Staphylinus cyanipennis Runde, 1835: 7 is<br />

a junior primary homonym of Philonthus cyanipennis<br />

(Fabricius, 1793: 525) (ex Staphylinus),<br />

and the two homonyms were not congeneric<br />

after 1899 (Herman, in press). Staphylinus<br />

cyanipennis Runde has not been<br />

used since its original description, and thus<br />

it should be regarded a nomen dubium and<br />

the required replacement ignored.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!