23.10.2013 Views

Section 2 - FTSE

Section 2 - FTSE

Section 2 - FTSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SECURITIES LENDING ROUNDTABLE<br />

64<br />

DAVID RULE, chief executive officer, International Securities Lending<br />

Association (ISLA)<br />

COPING WITH MARKET VOLATILITY<br />

FC: How does current market volatility play out? Does it<br />

favour custodians or third party lenders?<br />

RS: One of the things that helps players better differentiate<br />

themselves is: did their performance track the rising market<br />

or did they actually outperform it? This is where more<br />

transparency of data can help. When it comes to the more<br />

volatile markets we are seeing at the moment, it’s really time<br />

to revisit your lending programme parameters such as cash<br />

investment guidelines to determine that they are appropriate<br />

given the concerns we are seeing. In this sense you have to<br />

step back and say that although people may be looking for<br />

alpha, they are not willing to risk their portfolio in a market<br />

like this and are looking now to manage risks accordingly.<br />

CJ: Many beneficial owners have under taken reviews of<br />

their programs in response to recent market events and are<br />

evaluating their approach and reviewing the risks and<br />

returns within their program. Some beneficial owners have<br />

made changes to certain parameters or guidelines where<br />

appropriate, while others have reaffirmed their existing<br />

structures. This is not unique to custodians, third parties or<br />

direct exclusives. It’s a client issue related to their specific<br />

goals, return expectations and risk profile.<br />

MC: As the old saying goes, return of your capital is more<br />

important than return on your capital. I suspect that what<br />

is happening in the market at the moment will probably be,<br />

in the medium to long term, healthy for the industry. The<br />

closest thing most people can remember that compares to<br />

this in recent times is probably Long Term Capital<br />

Management, back in 1998. That whole episode spurred the<br />

development and improvement of collateral management<br />

in terms of its robustness, pricing methodology etc. It is only<br />

in times of crisis that any flaws or weaknesses in the system<br />

become apparent. It is too soon to say whether we will see<br />

any in our little subset of the overall market universe. The<br />

area of the securities finance industry that is probably most<br />

exposed to a potential credit loss is the cash reinvestment<br />

business, run predominantly by the US global custodian<br />

agency lending programmes. Over the course of the history<br />

of this industry, any credit losses have been on the cash<br />

reinvestment side rather than on the actual lending side of<br />

the business. We do have some cash reinvestment business<br />

but ours is all fully collateralised and pretty low risk.<br />

MF: The key questions that Mick partially addressed there<br />

was, “How much of my lending revenue actually comes<br />

from lending? How much of my lending revenue comes<br />

from cash reinvestment? And these are going to be the<br />

questions that people are going to be focusing on, if they<br />

aren’t already doing so, now and in the coming weeks.<br />

There are lots of different ways to make money from cash<br />

reinvestment, as we know. Invariably, the strategies<br />

employed by certain re-investors of cash will come under<br />

scrutiny and the clients will ask themselves and their<br />

providers,“was that a good strategy or a bad one for me the<br />

client who is at risk?” I don’t think for one minute that<br />

anybody engaged in securities lending has deliberately<br />

breached client guidelines. Everybody in securities lending<br />

knows that they cannot do that. Nonetheless, there are<br />

providers who, if you ask them, will say: “We always<br />

operate well within or right in the centre of our clients’<br />

guidelines. We actually do take less risk than our clients<br />

would allow us to take on their behalf because we have got<br />

tremendous understanding of the money markets and<br />

strong internal controls. ”I believe many of them when they<br />

say that. However, they also privately allude to there being<br />

providers that are out there trading on the edge of client<br />

guidelines a little bit and we may find that those might have<br />

some issues. This could be sour grapes at losing business to<br />

high income projections from competitors—but if it isn’t the<br />

clients, the market will find out very soon. In the Financial<br />

Times recently, Deutsche Bank said something of vital<br />

relevance. It had to do with confidence and banking and<br />

noted that crucial questions in the next days and weeks<br />

include “How do you mark your positions to market? What<br />

price are you putting on the securities that you have<br />

invested in?”It is a question that investors want answered<br />

by their cash reinvestment providers and I would really<br />

encourage anyone who is a lender who takes cash as<br />

collateral, to consider asking them now. Some will take<br />

great comfort from the responses – others may not.<br />

FC: What role can ISLA play in encouraging that dialogue?<br />

DR: One of the things that ISLA has been doing is<br />

developing operational best practice guidelines, including<br />

NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2007 • <strong>FTSE</strong> GLOBAL MARKETS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!