10.11.2013 Views

Technical Paper by A. Fakher and C.J.F.P. Jones WHEN THE ...

Technical Paper by A. Fakher and C.J.F.P. Jones WHEN THE ...

Technical Paper by A. Fakher and C.J.F.P. Jones WHEN THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FAKHER & JONES • When Bending Stiffness of Geosynthetic Reinforcement is Important<br />

0.18<br />

0.12<br />

0.06<br />

0.00<br />

Yd / B<br />

-0.06<br />

-0.12<br />

-0.18<br />

-0.24<br />

f-20, B = 50.4 mm, beam, s/B = 0.3<br />

f-20, B = 50.4 mm, cable, s/B = 0.3<br />

f-31, B = 252 mm, beam, s/B = 0.3<br />

f-31, B = 252 mm, cable, s/B = 0.3<br />

-0.30<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

X/B<br />

Figure 9. The effect of footing size on the deformed shape of the geosynthetic<br />

reinforcement.<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

Ratio = Bearing capacity from analysis with beam elements<br />

Bearing capacity from analysis with cable elements<br />

1.3<br />

Ratio<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

Figure 10.<br />

1.0<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000<br />

Shear strength of clay, C (Pa)<br />

The influence of shear strength of the underlying clay on the bearing capacity.<br />

3.5 Deformation <strong>and</strong> Displacement of the Continuum Materials<br />

The deformed shape of the finite difference grid, representing the super soft clay, the<br />

reinforcement, <strong>and</strong> the overlying s<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the directions of the principal stresses are<br />

shown in Figure 11. The data are derived from test f-20 at s/B = 0.3 (Table 1).<br />

454 GEOSYN<strong>THE</strong>TICS INTERNATIONAL • 2001, VOL. 8, NO. 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!