Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1048<br />
L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059<br />
Table 3<br />
Summary of the pollen stratigraphy, ch<strong>ro</strong>nology <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> history for Preluca Tiganului (see Fig. 4 for pollen diagram). A correlation with the<br />
pollen zonation for Steregoiu is also given<br />
Zone<br />
Depth<br />
(m)<br />
Age<br />
(cal. years BP)<br />
Description<br />
Inferred local upl<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Correlation with<br />
Steregoiu<br />
P1,<br />
Pinus–Poaceae<br />
LPAZ<br />
9.89–9.75 c. 14,400–14,350 Very high pollen percentages for<br />
Pinus (55–80%), high percentages<br />
for Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<br />
(15–35%), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />
values for Betula (2–3%) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Cyperaceae (1.5–3%). Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae have significant<br />
occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />
pollen grains of Juniperus<br />
Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> with a<br />
dominance of grasses.<br />
Scattered Pinus individuals<br />
Middle part of<br />
S2?<br />
P2,<br />
Pinus–<br />
Poaceae–<br />
Cyperaceae<br />
LPAZ<br />
9.75–9.32 14,350–14,150 Very high pollen percentages for<br />
Pinus (60–75%), high percentages<br />
for Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<br />
(15–20%), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />
values for Betula, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Artemisia. Alnus, Salix, Juniperus<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae have<br />
significant occurrences. Presence of<br />
scattered pollen grains of Picea.<br />
Compared to the preceding zone,<br />
Artemisia, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Juniperus have increased<br />
Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />
likely a mosaic with low<br />
shrubs, grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
herbs. Scattered Pinus<br />
individuals<br />
Late phase of S2?<br />
P3, Pinus–<br />
Betula LPAZ<br />
9.32–9.08 14,150–14,050 Very high pollen percentages for<br />
Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Betula (above 50% in<br />
the topmost sample), fairly high<br />
percentages for Poaceae undiff.<br />
o40 mm, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />
values for Artemisia. Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Cyperaceae have significant<br />
occurrences. Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae have a continuous<br />
presence with low values.<br />
Compared to the preceding zone,<br />
Betula has increased, while<br />
Juniperus, Poaceae undiff. o40 mm,<br />
Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia have<br />
decreased<br />
Open forest dominated by<br />
Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> some Betula<br />
individuals. Expansion of<br />
Betula in local carr forest<br />
Earliest phase of<br />
S3?<br />
P4, Pinus–<br />
Poaceae–<br />
Artemisia LPAZ<br />
9.08–8.60 14,050–13,800 Very high pollen percentages for<br />
Pinus (50–80%), high <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> fairly<br />
high percentages for Poaceae<br />
undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Betula (only in<br />
the bottom-most sample), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low,<br />
but significant values for<br />
Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia. Alnus,<br />
Salix, Juniperus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae have significant<br />
occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />
pollen grains of Picea. Compared<br />
to the preceding zone, Poaceae<br />
undiff. o40 mm, Cyperaceae,<br />
Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae<br />
have increased, while Betula has<br />
decreased<br />
Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />
likely a mosaic with low<br />
shrubs, grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
herbs. Scattered Pinus<br />
individuals<br />
S3?<br />
P5, Pinus–Picea–<br />
Betula LPAZ<br />
8.60–8.00 13,800–12,950 High to very high pollen<br />
percentages for Pinus (35–70%)<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Picea (5–40%), fairly high<br />
percentages for Betula, Alnus,<br />
Open forest, initially<br />
dominated by Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Picea. Pinus was p<strong>ro</strong>bably<br />
also common. Local<br />
S4