13.11.2013 Views

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1048<br />

L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059<br />

Table 3<br />

Summary of the pollen stratigraphy, ch<strong>ro</strong>nology <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> history for Preluca Tiganului (see Fig. 4 for pollen diagram). A correlation with the<br />

pollen zonation for Steregoiu is also given<br />

Zone<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Age<br />

(cal. years BP)<br />

Description<br />

Inferred local upl<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Correlation with<br />

Steregoiu<br />

P1,<br />

Pinus–Poaceae<br />

LPAZ<br />

9.89–9.75 c. 14,400–14,350 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Pinus (55–80%), high percentages<br />

for Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<br />

(15–35%), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Betula (2–3%) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae (1.5–3%). Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have significant<br />

occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />

pollen grains of Juniperus<br />

Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> with a<br />

dominance of grasses.<br />

Scattered Pinus individuals<br />

Middle part of<br />

S2?<br />

P2,<br />

Pinus–<br />

Poaceae–<br />

Cyperaceae<br />

LPAZ<br />

9.75–9.32 14,350–14,150 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Pinus (60–75%), high percentages<br />

for Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<br />

(15–20%), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Betula, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Artemisia. Alnus, Salix, Juniperus<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae have<br />

significant occurrences. Presence of<br />

scattered pollen grains of Picea.<br />

Compared to the preceding zone,<br />

Artemisia, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Juniperus have increased<br />

Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />

likely a mosaic with low<br />

shrubs, grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

herbs. Scattered Pinus<br />

individuals<br />

Late phase of S2?<br />

P3, Pinus–<br />

Betula LPAZ<br />

9.32–9.08 14,150–14,050 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Betula (above 50% in<br />

the topmost sample), fairly high<br />

percentages for Poaceae undiff.<br />

o40 mm, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Artemisia. Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae have significant<br />

occurrences. Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have a continuous<br />

presence with low values.<br />

Compared to the preceding zone,<br />

Betula has increased, while<br />

Juniperus, Poaceae undiff. o40 mm,<br />

Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia have<br />

decreased<br />

Open forest dominated by<br />

Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> some Betula<br />

individuals. Expansion of<br />

Betula in local carr forest<br />

Earliest phase of<br />

S3?<br />

P4, Pinus–<br />

Poaceae–<br />

Artemisia LPAZ<br />

9.08–8.60 14,050–13,800 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Pinus (50–80%), high <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> fairly<br />

high percentages for Poaceae<br />

undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Betula (only in<br />

the bottom-most sample), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low,<br />

but significant values for<br />

Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia. Alnus,<br />

Salix, Juniperus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have significant<br />

occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />

pollen grains of Picea. Compared<br />

to the preceding zone, Poaceae<br />

undiff. o40 mm, Cyperaceae,<br />

Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae<br />

have increased, while Betula has<br />

decreased<br />

Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />

likely a mosaic with low<br />

shrubs, grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

herbs. Scattered Pinus<br />

individuals<br />

S3?<br />

P5, Pinus–Picea–<br />

Betula LPAZ<br />

8.60–8.00 13,800–12,950 High to very high pollen<br />

percentages for Pinus (35–70%)<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Picea (5–40%), fairly high<br />

percentages for Betula, Alnus,<br />

Open forest, initially<br />

dominated by Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Picea. Pinus was p<strong>ro</strong>bably<br />

also common. Local<br />

S4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!