13.11.2013 Views

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059 1043<br />

Table 2<br />

AMS 14 C dates f<strong>ro</strong>mPreluca Tiganului <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Steregoiu. Calibrated ages at 72s as derived by the OxCal 3.5 computer p<strong>ro</strong>gram are also given (B<strong>ro</strong>nk<br />

Ramsey, 1995). The date used to construct a ch<strong>ro</strong>nology for the pollen diagrams (Figs. 2 <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> 3) is either, a mid-point of the calibrated interval (at<br />

72s), or an adjusted date, which takes into account the calibration curve <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> the most p<strong>ro</strong>bable interval (at both 71s <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> 72s), <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> the<br />

stratigraphic position of the sample (assuming a <strong>ro</strong>ughly uniform sedimentation rate, see ch<strong>ro</strong>nology chapter)<br />

14 C Lab. number Depth (m) Dated material<br />

14 C age BP Calibrated years BP Date used to construct<br />

a ch<strong>ro</strong>nology (cal. years BP)<br />

(A) Preluca Tiganului<br />

Ua-16341 5.25–5.205 Charcoal, wood,<br />

8565790 9900–9400 9650 at 5.23 m<br />

bark<br />

Ua-16340 6.07–6.03 Wood 91857100 10,640–10,610 (1.4%), 10,450 at 6.05 m<br />

10,590–10,180 (94%)<br />

Ua-16339 6.34–6.29 Wood 9680790 11,250–10,700 10,900 at 6.315 m<br />

Ua-16338 6.43–6.385 Wood 9685795 11,250–10,700 11,150 at 6.41 m<br />

Ua-16337 6.725–6.68 Peat (washed) 10,240790 12,750–11,350 11,400 at 6.70 m<br />

Ua-16336 7.09–7.045 Wood 10,2657115 12,850–11,350 11,675 at 7.07 m<br />

Ua-16335 7.36–7.315 Peat (washed) 10,1907110 12,750–11,250 11,750 at 7.34 m<br />

Ua-16334 8.285–8.24 Picea needles,<br />

11,5157115 13,850–13,150 13,450 at 8.26 m<br />

bark, wood<br />

Ua-16333 8.73–8.70 Twigs 11,9507125 14,350–13,550 13,950 at 8.715 m<br />

Ua-16332 9.19–9.14 Picea needles, cone 12,0657115 y–14,626 (45.7%), 14,100 at 9.165 m<br />

14,350–13,800 (47.5%),<br />

13,750–13,650 (2.2%)<br />

Ua-16331 9.45–9.40 Picea needles 12,2307105 15,450–14,550 (62.5%), 14,200 at 9.425 m<br />

14,450–14,050 (29.7%),<br />

13,950–13,750 (3.2%)<br />

Ua-16330 9.905–9.85 Wood 12,2507105 15,450–14,550 (63.9%), 14,400 at 9.88 m<br />

14,450–14,050 (29.1%),<br />

13,950–13,850 (2.4%)<br />

(B) Steregoiu<br />

Ua-16329 3.28–3.23 Picea needles 8300785 9490–9030 9260 at 3.255 m<br />

Ua-16328 4.05–4.004 Picea needles,<br />

9130795 10,600–9900 10,250 at 4.03 m<br />

twigs, leaf fragments<br />

Ua-16327 4.36–4.32 Picea needles 9530785 11,200–10,550 10,700 at 4.34 m<br />

Ua-16326 4.544–4.50 Wood fragments 96657110 11,250–10,600 11,100 at 4.52 m<br />

Ua-16325 4.694–4.64 Charcoal, leaves, 10,3257150 12,850–11,350 11,400 at 4.67 m<br />

wood<br />

Ua-16324 5.164–5.12 Wood fragments 10,9107105 13,200–12,800 (80.6%), 12,150 at 5.14 m<br />

12,750–12,600 (14.8%)<br />

Ua-16323 5.324–5.274 Leaves, Picea<br />

needle, wood<br />

12,3657115 15,450–14,050 14,000 at 5.30 m<br />

AMS 14 C measurements were carried out on terrestrial<br />

plant mac<strong>ro</strong>fossils (Table 2). The samples were<br />

treated with 1% HCl (6 h below boiling point) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> 0.5%<br />

NaOH (1 h at 601C), then dried at 1001C overnight in<br />

small glass bottles <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> sent to the AMS facility in<br />

Uppsala, Sweden. F<strong>ro</strong>mthe first site, Preluca Tiganului,<br />

12 samples were dated, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> f<strong>ro</strong>m the second, Steregoiu,<br />

seven samples were dated.<br />

4. Results <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> interpretations<br />

4.1. Lithostratigraphy<br />

Simplified stratigraphies for the analysed p<strong>ro</strong>files<br />

f<strong>ro</strong>mPreluca Tiganului (0–9.90 m) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Steregoiu<br />

(0–5.92 m) are presented in Table 1 (see also lithology<br />

columns in the pollen diagrams, Figs. 4 <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> 5).<br />

The stratigraphy for Preluca Tiganului indicates<br />

that the crater lake became overg<strong>ro</strong>wn relatively<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>early</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> (at 8.70 m), when carr peat started to accumulate<br />

(Fig. 4). F<strong>ro</strong>mthis level on the site has been a mire,<br />

initially with carr <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, but f<strong>ro</strong>m6.13 m<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> upwards, it has been a more or less open fen.<br />

Since the bottomsediment in the cored p<strong>ro</strong>file is fine<br />

detritus gyttja, this may imply that the corer did not<br />

penetrate into the oldest sediments in the basin, which<br />

may be more or less mine<strong>ro</strong>genic (cf. stratigraphy<br />

for Steregoiu) (Wohlfarth et al., in press). Between<br />

9.90 <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> 8.70 mdifferent types of lake sediment were<br />

deposited (Table 1), varying f<strong>ro</strong>mfine <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> coarse<br />

detritus gyttja, to clay gyttja <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> gyttja peat. These

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!