13.11.2013 Views

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059 1053<br />

Table 4 (continued)<br />

Zone<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Age<br />

(cal. years BP)<br />

Description<br />

Inferred local upl<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Correlation with<br />

Preluca<br />

Tiganului<br />

Ulmus. Compared to the preceding<br />

zone, Pinus, Juniperus, Poaceae<br />

undiff. o40 mm, Artemisia,<br />

Chenopodiaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae have increased, while<br />

Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> have<br />

decreased<br />

S7, Pinus–<br />

Betula–Alnus<br />

LPAZ<br />

4.69–4.59 11,500–11,250 High pollen percentages for Pinus<br />

(35–40%), fairly high percentages<br />

for Betula (c. 15%), Alnus (10–<br />

20%), Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Artemisia, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Ulmus, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae. Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Salix<br />

have significant occurrences.<br />

Presence of scattered pollen<br />

grains of Quercus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juniperus.<br />

Compared to the preceding zone,<br />

Betula, Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Ulmus have<br />

increased, while Pinus, Juniperus,<br />

Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae<br />

have decreased. Ulmus<br />

shows increasing values<br />

th<strong>ro</strong>ughout the zone (it starts<br />

with very low values <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> ends<br />

with c. 10%)<br />

Open forest dominated by<br />

Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Pinus.<br />

Establishment <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> expansion<br />

of Ulmus<br />

P8<br />

S8, Ulmus–<br />

Pinus–Betula<br />

LPAZ<br />

4.59–4.36 11,250–10,750 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Ulmus (20–45%), fairly high<br />

percentages for Pinus, Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Picea, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Alnus, Poaceae undiff.<br />

o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia. Fraxinus,<br />

Quercus, Tilia, Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae have significant<br />

occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />

pollen grains of Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Juniperus. Compared to the<br />

preceding zone, Ulmus, Fraxinus,<br />

Picea, Quercus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Tilia have<br />

increased, while Alnus, Pinus,<br />

Juniperus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia have<br />

decreased. Fraxinus, Picea,<br />

Quercus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Tilia are showing<br />

increasing values th<strong>ro</strong>ughout<br />

the zone<br />

Dense forest dominated by<br />

Ulmus, but Picea, Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Pinus were also common.<br />

Establishment of Quercus, Tilia<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fraxinus<br />

P9<br />

S9, Ulmus–<br />

Picea–Fraxinus<br />

LPAZ<br />

4.36–3.98 10,750–10,200 Very high pollen percentages for<br />

Ulmus (40–45%), fairly high<br />

percentages for Picea, Pinus,<br />

Betula, Fraxinus, Tilia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Quercus, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant<br />

values for Alnus, Corylus, Poaceae<br />

undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia.<br />

Salix, Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have significant<br />

occurrences. Presence of scattered<br />

pollen grains of Acer. Compared to<br />

the preceding zone, Fraxinus, Tilia<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Quercus have increased, while<br />

Dense forest dominated by<br />

Ulmus, but Picea, Quercus,<br />

Tilia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fraxinus were also<br />

common. Establishment of<br />

Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Acer<br />

P10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!