13.11.2013 Views

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059 1049<br />

Table 3 (continued)<br />

Zone<br />

Depth<br />

(m)<br />

Age<br />

(cal. years BP)<br />

Description<br />

Inferred local upl<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Correlation with<br />

Steregoiu<br />

Poaceae undiff. o40 mm,<br />

Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

low, but significant values for Salix<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae. Ulmus has<br />

significant values only in the<br />

middle <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> the topmost part of the<br />

zone. Presence of single or<br />

scattered pollen grains of Quercus,<br />

Fraxinus, Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juniperus.<br />

Compared to the preceding zone,<br />

Betula, Alnus, Picea, Cyperaceae,<br />

Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae<br />

have increased, while Pinus has<br />

decreased<br />

establishment <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

expansion of Picea. At the<br />

middle of the zone, Ulmus<br />

p<strong>ro</strong>bably also was<br />

established<br />

P6, Pinus–<br />

Artemisia–<br />

Cyperaceae<br />

LPAZ<br />

8.00–7.79 12,950–12,600 High pollen percentages for Pinus,<br />

Artemisia (10–25%) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae (10–20%), fairly high<br />

percentages for Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Picea,<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant values for<br />

Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae. Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Salix<br />

have significant occurrences.<br />

Presence of single or scattered<br />

pollen grains of Quercus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Ulmus. Compared to the preceding<br />

zone, Cyperaceae, Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have increased,<br />

while Betula, Pinus, Alnus, Picea<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Poaceae undiff. o40 mmhave<br />

decreased<br />

Open forest dominated by<br />

Picea, Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Pinus.<br />

Ulmus diminished already<br />

at the beginning of the zone.<br />

At the end of the zone<br />

expansion of open<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, particularly by<br />

Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae<br />

S5<br />

P7, Pinus–<br />

Artemisia LPAZ<br />

7.79–6.82 12,600–11,500 Very high or high pollen<br />

percentages for Pinus (40–75%)<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia (10–25%), fairly<br />

high percentages for Betula,<br />

Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Cyperaceae, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but<br />

significant values for Alnus, Picea<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae. Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Juniperus have significant<br />

occurrences. Compared to the<br />

preceding zone, Betula, Pinus,<br />

Juniperus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Poaceae undiff.<br />

o40 mmhave increased, while<br />

Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Cyperaceae have<br />

decreased<br />

Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />

likely a mosaic with low<br />

shrubs (mainly Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Juniperus), grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

herbs. Scattered Betula<br />

individuals<br />

S6<br />

P8, Pinus–<br />

Betula–Artemisia<br />

LPAZ<br />

6.82–6.49 11,500–11,200 High pollen percentages for Pinus<br />

(25–35%), Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia,<br />

fairly high percentages for Poaceae<br />

undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Cyperaceae,<br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant values for<br />

Alnus, Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae.<br />

Presence of single or scattered<br />

pollen grains of Quercus, Ulmus,<br />

Tilia, Fraxinus, Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Juniperus. Compared to the<br />

preceding zone, Betula, Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Chenopodiaceae have increased,<br />

while Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juniperus have<br />

decreased<br />

Open forest dominated by<br />

Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Pinus<br />

S7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!