Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
Lateglacial and early Holocene vegetation ... - geo.edu.ro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L. Bj .orkman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 21 (2002) 1039–1059 1049<br />
Table 3 (continued)<br />
Zone<br />
Depth<br />
(m)<br />
Age<br />
(cal. years BP)<br />
Description<br />
Inferred local upl<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Correlation with<br />
Steregoiu<br />
Poaceae undiff. o40 mm,<br />
Cyperaceae <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
low, but significant values for Salix<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae. Ulmus has<br />
significant values only in the<br />
middle <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> the topmost part of the<br />
zone. Presence of single or<br />
scattered pollen grains of Quercus,<br />
Fraxinus, Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juniperus.<br />
Compared to the preceding zone,<br />
Betula, Alnus, Picea, Cyperaceae,<br />
Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae<br />
have increased, while Pinus has<br />
decreased<br />
establishment <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
expansion of Picea. At the<br />
middle of the zone, Ulmus<br />
p<strong>ro</strong>bably also was<br />
established<br />
P6, Pinus–<br />
Artemisia–<br />
Cyperaceae<br />
LPAZ<br />
8.00–7.79 12,950–12,600 High pollen percentages for Pinus,<br />
Artemisia (10–25%) <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Cyperaceae (10–20%), fairly high<br />
percentages for Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Picea,<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant values for<br />
Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae. Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Salix<br />
have significant occurrences.<br />
Presence of single or scattered<br />
pollen grains of Quercus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Ulmus. Compared to the preceding<br />
zone, Cyperaceae, Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae have increased,<br />
while Betula, Pinus, Alnus, Picea<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Poaceae undiff. o40 mmhave<br />
decreased<br />
Open forest dominated by<br />
Picea, Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Pinus.<br />
Ulmus diminished already<br />
at the beginning of the zone.<br />
At the end of the zone<br />
expansion of open<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, particularly by<br />
Artemisia <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae<br />
S5<br />
P7, Pinus–<br />
Artemisia LPAZ<br />
7.79–6.82 12,600–11,500 Very high or high pollen<br />
percentages for Pinus (40–75%)<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia (10–25%), fairly<br />
high percentages for Betula,<br />
Poaceae undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Cyperaceae, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but<br />
significant values for Alnus, Picea<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae. Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Juniperus have significant<br />
occurrences. Compared to the<br />
preceding zone, Betula, Pinus,<br />
Juniperus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Poaceae undiff.<br />
o40 mmhave increased, while<br />
Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Cyperaceae have<br />
decreased<br />
Open <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>vegetation</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, most<br />
likely a mosaic with low<br />
shrubs (mainly Salix <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Juniperus), grass, sedges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
herbs. Scattered Betula<br />
individuals<br />
S6<br />
P8, Pinus–<br />
Betula–Artemisia<br />
LPAZ<br />
6.82–6.49 11,500–11,200 High pollen percentages for Pinus<br />
(25–35%), Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Artemisia,<br />
fairly high percentages for Poaceae<br />
undiff. o40 mm<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Cyperaceae,<br />
<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> low, but significant values for<br />
Alnus, Picea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Chenopodiaceae.<br />
Presence of single or scattered<br />
pollen grains of Quercus, Ulmus,<br />
Tilia, Fraxinus, Corylus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Juniperus. Compared to the<br />
preceding zone, Betula, Alnus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />
Chenopodiaceae have increased,<br />
while Pinus <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Juniperus have<br />
decreased<br />
Open forest dominated by<br />
Betula <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Pinus<br />
S7