17.11.2013 Views

A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...

A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...

A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A CRITICISM OF THE CELL-THEORY. 151<br />

st<strong>an</strong>ding <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm, <strong>an</strong>d it might be said<br />

that, if we know nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> component, it is useless <strong>to</strong><br />

make assertions about <strong>the</strong> compost; but it will at least be<br />

useful <strong>to</strong> criticise <strong>the</strong> attempts which have been made.<br />

Hertwig gives this definition, which is <strong>the</strong> same as that<br />

originally given by Max Schulze. A cell is a corpuscle <strong>of</strong><br />

pro<strong>to</strong>plasm in which is contained a specially org<strong>an</strong>ised constituent,<br />

<strong>the</strong> nucleus. (Die Zelle ist ein kliitnpchen von Pro<strong>to</strong>plasma,<br />

das in seinen Innern einen besonders geformten<br />

Best<strong>an</strong>d<strong>the</strong>il, den Kern (Nucleus) einschliesst.) This at first<br />

sight seems satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry enough, but <strong>the</strong> more one examines<br />

it, <strong>the</strong> less satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry does it appear, in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>isms which are usually described as single cells.<br />

If a corpuscle containing a nucleus is a cell, is a corpuscle<br />

Containing two or more nuclei also a cell ? And still more, is<br />

a large mass <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm containing m<strong>an</strong>y nuclei <strong>to</strong> be<br />

regarded as a cell ? Such a mass, I me<strong>an</strong>, as Botrydium,<br />

Caulerpa, or Codium, or even Pelomyxa. By m<strong>an</strong>y authors<br />

<strong>the</strong>se org<strong>an</strong>isms are regarded as single multinucleate cells, but<br />

I am far from <strong>being</strong> convinced that this is a right view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

case. 1<br />

If <strong>the</strong>re is one thing more th<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r which has come<br />

in<strong>to</strong> prominence as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> recent research, both bot<strong>an</strong>ical<br />

<strong>an</strong>d zoological, it is <strong>the</strong> fundamental import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

nucleus <strong>to</strong> cell life. So m<strong>an</strong>y minute org<strong>an</strong>isms, which at one<br />

1 With regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument which follows, I would remind my readers<br />

that Hackel, thirty years ago, clearly expressed <strong>the</strong> view which I am now<br />

urging (see his " Allgemeine Ana<strong>to</strong>mie den Org<strong>an</strong>ismen," forming <strong>the</strong> first<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ' Generelle Morphologie,' p. 296). " Es muss hierbei ausdriicklich<br />

errinert werden, dass wir unter eine Zelle nur einen Plasma-Klumpen mit<br />

einem Kerne verstehen konnen. Der haufig gebrauchte Ausdruck einer<br />

' mehrkernigen Zelle' ist eine Contradictio in adjec<strong>to</strong>, da ja eben nur die<br />

Einheit des Kerns die individuelle Einheit der Zelle als eines Elementar-<br />

Org<strong>an</strong>ismus bedingt. Jeder Plasmaklumpen, der mehr als einen Kern<br />

umschliessfc, moge er nun von einer Membr<strong>an</strong> umhiillt sein oder nicht, ist eine<br />

Vielheit von Zellen, und wenn diese Yielheit eine bestimmte einheitliche<br />

Form besitzt, so haben wir sie als Zellens<strong>to</strong>ck zu dem R<strong>an</strong>ge eines Org<strong>an</strong>es<br />

erster Ordnung zu erheben." This view, however, has been controverted by<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y authorities, as will appear fur<strong>the</strong>r on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!