A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A CRITICISM OF THE CELL-THEORY. 151<br />
st<strong>an</strong>ding <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm, <strong>an</strong>d it might be said<br />
that, if we know nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> component, it is useless <strong>to</strong><br />
make assertions about <strong>the</strong> compost; but it will at least be<br />
useful <strong>to</strong> criticise <strong>the</strong> attempts which have been made.<br />
Hertwig gives this definition, which is <strong>the</strong> same as that<br />
originally given by Max Schulze. A cell is a corpuscle <strong>of</strong><br />
pro<strong>to</strong>plasm in which is contained a specially org<strong>an</strong>ised constituent,<br />
<strong>the</strong> nucleus. (Die Zelle ist ein kliitnpchen von Pro<strong>to</strong>plasma,<br />
das in seinen Innern einen besonders geformten<br />
Best<strong>an</strong>d<strong>the</strong>il, den Kern (Nucleus) einschliesst.) This at first<br />
sight seems satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry enough, but <strong>the</strong> more one examines<br />
it, <strong>the</strong> less satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry does it appear, in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>isms which are usually described as single cells.<br />
If a corpuscle containing a nucleus is a cell, is a corpuscle<br />
Containing two or more nuclei also a cell ? And still more, is<br />
a large mass <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm containing m<strong>an</strong>y nuclei <strong>to</strong> be<br />
regarded as a cell ? Such a mass, I me<strong>an</strong>, as Botrydium,<br />
Caulerpa, or Codium, or even Pelomyxa. By m<strong>an</strong>y authors<br />
<strong>the</strong>se org<strong>an</strong>isms are regarded as single multinucleate cells, but<br />
I am far from <strong>being</strong> convinced that this is a right view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
case. 1<br />
If <strong>the</strong>re is one thing more th<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r which has come<br />
in<strong>to</strong> prominence as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> recent research, both bot<strong>an</strong>ical<br />
<strong>an</strong>d zoological, it is <strong>the</strong> fundamental import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
nucleus <strong>to</strong> cell life. So m<strong>an</strong>y minute org<strong>an</strong>isms, which at one<br />
1 With regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument which follows, I would remind my readers<br />
that Hackel, thirty years ago, clearly expressed <strong>the</strong> view which I am now<br />
urging (see his " Allgemeine Ana<strong>to</strong>mie den Org<strong>an</strong>ismen," forming <strong>the</strong> first<br />
part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ' Generelle Morphologie,' p. 296). " Es muss hierbei ausdriicklich<br />
errinert werden, dass wir unter eine Zelle nur einen Plasma-Klumpen mit<br />
einem Kerne verstehen konnen. Der haufig gebrauchte Ausdruck einer<br />
' mehrkernigen Zelle' ist eine Contradictio in adjec<strong>to</strong>, da ja eben nur die<br />
Einheit des Kerns die individuelle Einheit der Zelle als eines Elementar-<br />
Org<strong>an</strong>ismus bedingt. Jeder Plasmaklumpen, der mehr als einen Kern<br />
umschliessfc, moge er nun von einer Membr<strong>an</strong> umhiillt sein oder nicht, ist eine<br />
Vielheit von Zellen, und wenn diese Yielheit eine bestimmte einheitliche<br />
Form besitzt, so haben wir sie als Zellens<strong>to</strong>ck zu dem R<strong>an</strong>ge eines Org<strong>an</strong>es<br />
erster Ordnung zu erheben." This view, however, has been controverted by<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y authorities, as will appear fur<strong>the</strong>r on.