A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A ORTTIOISM OP THE OELL-THEORY. 171<br />
cells, recent researches on cell lineages may perhaps give us<br />
a clue <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that blas<strong>to</strong>meres are<br />
in so m<strong>an</strong>y cases, no more th<strong>an</strong> coherent. For it is noticeable<br />
that wherever cell lineages, with marked isolation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blas<strong>to</strong>meres,<br />
have been described, <strong>the</strong>re is a decided tendency <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
precocious development <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>s, or, at <strong>an</strong>y rate, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> precocious<br />
isolation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primordia (Anlage) <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>s.<br />
It seems probable that <strong>the</strong> discrete condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blas<strong>to</strong>meres<br />
is connected with <strong>the</strong> fact, <strong>to</strong> which I alluded in <strong>the</strong><br />
earlier part <strong>of</strong> this essay, that <strong>the</strong>y are, from <strong>the</strong> very outset,<br />
specialised. They have each a definite molecular constitution<br />
different from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>an</strong>d, in figurative l<strong>an</strong>guage, a<br />
limited part <strong>to</strong> perform, which <strong>the</strong>y could not perform <strong>to</strong><br />
adv<strong>an</strong>tage if <strong>the</strong>y were conjunct with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r blas<strong>to</strong>meres<br />
<strong>an</strong>d shared in <strong>the</strong>ir different molecular constitution. But<br />
this is a subject which I must leave for a future occasion when<br />
I discuss <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> von Baer's law <strong>of</strong> development.<br />
( I have travelled in this essay over a great deal <strong>of</strong> ground,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d I have necessarily had <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>uch more lightly on m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
<strong>to</strong>pics th<strong>an</strong> I should have wished. I hope that I may at<br />
least have succeeded in presenting my arguments in a m<strong>an</strong>ner<br />
which will make <strong>the</strong>m clear <strong>to</strong> my readers, <strong>an</strong>d that I have not<br />
been <strong>to</strong>o discursive. Starting from <strong>Mr</strong>. <strong>Sedgwick's</strong> propositions<br />
<strong>an</strong>d accusations, I have tried <strong>to</strong> show what is or was <strong>the</strong> exact<br />
extent <strong>an</strong>d me<strong>an</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cell-<strong>the</strong>ory ; I have tried <strong>to</strong> examine<br />
it <strong>an</strong>d show how much was good <strong>an</strong>d how much bad, <strong>an</strong>d I<br />
have finally been led <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> conclusion—which is not quite<br />
what I proposed <strong>to</strong> myself at <strong>the</strong> outset—that <strong>the</strong> cell concept<br />
is a valuable expression <strong>of</strong> our experience <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ic life, both<br />
morphologically <strong>an</strong>d physiologically, but that in higher org<strong>an</strong>isms<br />
cells are much what von Sachs declares <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong><br />
be, not independent life units (Lebenseinzelheiten), but a<br />
phenomenon so general as <strong>to</strong> be <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest signific<strong>an</strong>ce;<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> const<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d definite expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formative<br />
forces which reside in so high a degree in org<strong>an</strong>ic matter.<br />
Lest I should appear <strong>to</strong> have minimised <strong>the</strong> import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> cell <strong>to</strong>o much, let me conclude by saying, that nothing